2002
DOI: 10.1002/cpa.10058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonstationary weak limit of a stationary harmonic map sequence

Abstract: Let M and N be two compact Riemannian manifolds. Let u k be a sequence of stationary harmonic maps from M to N with bounded energies. We may assume that it converges weakly to a weakly harmonic map u in H 1,2 (M, N ) as k → ∞. In this paper, we construct an example to show that the limit map u may not be stationary.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…if f i = 0 for all i), their limit might not be stationary. An interesting example of this is given in [DLL03].…”
Section: Weak Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…if f i = 0 for all i), their limit might not be stationary. An interesting example of this is given in [DLL03].…”
Section: Weak Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not true for stationary maps, as bubbling can occur (see example 3.10). Moreover, it is worth mentioning that weak W 1,2 limits of stationary maps are in general not stationary, see [DLL03].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the first convergence is weak in H 1 loc while the second is in the sense of measures. Note that the limit u will be weakly harmonic, but need not be stationary harmonic (see [DLL03]). We have by [Lin99] that the defect measure ν is m − 2 rectifiable and so can be written…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Willmore [37] for a definition and basic properties of the Willmore functional). In general, however, the limit map u 0 may not be in H 2 loc (Ω, N), and (1.17) might be false (at least this is suggested by the related results of Ding, J. Li, and W. Li [5]). We only know that τ 1 (u 0 ) ∈ L 2 (Ω, R n ) by (1.16).…”
Section: Theorem 12 There Exists Anmentioning
confidence: 99%