1980
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320070406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonspecific X‐linked mental retardation I: A review with information from 24 new families

Abstract: Clinical manifestations and other aspects of nonspecific X-linked mental retardation are reviewed using data from the literature and information on affected males in 24 new families ascertained in British Columbia. A great degree of variability was apparent in the mental abilities of affected males. Speech defects, other CNS disorders and minor physical changes such as "big" ears or a highly arched palate were not present in many cases. Evidence for the existence of a clinical entity of mental retardation asso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fragile X syndrome was thus detected in more than 50% of the families with suspicion of X-linked mental retardation based on pedigree data. This proportion is in contrast with other authors (Herbst 1980) who found a higher percentage of the typical clinical syndrome in males of mar(X) negative families.…”
Section: Genetic Counselingcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fragile X syndrome was thus detected in more than 50% of the families with suspicion of X-linked mental retardation based on pedigree data. This proportion is in contrast with other authors (Herbst 1980) who found a higher percentage of the typical clinical syndrome in males of mar(X) negative families.…”
Section: Genetic Counselingcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…One hundred and thirteen of the 157 mar(X) male patients were postpubertal and 60% (see Table 2) manifested the typical triad: moderate mental retardation, long face and macroorchidism. This is in agreement with the findings of other authors (Sutherland & Ashforth 1979, Herbst 1980, Jacobs et al 1980, Jennings et al 1980, Herbst et al 1981, Mattei et al 1981, Carpenter 1983, Engel 1983, Jacobs et al 1983, Meryash et al 1984, Opitz & Sutherland 1984. In the clinically typical mar(X) male the face is long with large everted ears and mandibular prognathism, as well as a large quadrangular forehead with relative macrocephaly.…”
Section: The Postpubertal Patientssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ferrier, Bashir, Meryash, Johnston, and Wolff (1991) reported a mean percentage of stuttering of 4.9% in fragile X syndrome, 1.6% in autism and 6.1% in Down syndrome. Herbst (1980) recorded stuttering in only 3 out of 98 males with fragile X among 25 families. These figures should be interpreted cautiously, however, as their definition of "dysfluent" (nonfluent) speech differed from study to study.…”
Section: Fragile X Syndromementioning
confidence: 96%
“…The family pedigrees of karyotypically normal residents were subsequently examined for the presence of possible fra(X) negative non-specific XLMR. Pedigrees were postulated to show XLMR if they conformed to either of the following criteria (Herbst & Miller, 1980;Herbst, 1980;Fishburn et al, 1983): (1) affected males were present in at least two generations related through the mother of the proband; or (2) affected males were present in two sibships whose mothers were sisters. Pedigrees were excluded from X-linkage if the proband's MR was recorded as being due to: infections and intoxications; trauma or physical agents; disorders of metabolism, growth, and nutrition; gross postnatal brain disease; chromosomal abnormalities; and major psychiatric disorders (Herbst & Miller, 1980).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%