1997
DOI: 10.1006/abio.1997.2333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonspecific Amine Immobilization of Ligand Can Be a Potential Source of Error in BIAcore Binding Experiments and May Reduce Binding Affinities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…rium constants when comparing full-length and truncated PABP validates the two-site model for the full-length PABPPaip2 interaction and, importantly, indicates that binding of Paip2 to the two sites in PABP is noncooperative. Since Paip2 was used as ligand when binding to RRM1-4 and RRM2-3 and as an analyte when binding to full-length PABP, the consistency of the results also suggests that our immobilization strategy did not alter the affinities of the PABP binding sites or introduce any bias in the kinetic analysis due to heterogeneity which might be caused by protein immobilization (22). Two binding regions on Paip2 interact selectively with defined PABP fragments.…”
Section: Characterization Of Pabp Binding Sites In Paip2mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…rium constants when comparing full-length and truncated PABP validates the two-site model for the full-length PABPPaip2 interaction and, importantly, indicates that binding of Paip2 to the two sites in PABP is noncooperative. Since Paip2 was used as ligand when binding to RRM1-4 and RRM2-3 and as an analyte when binding to full-length PABP, the consistency of the results also suggests that our immobilization strategy did not alter the affinities of the PABP binding sites or introduce any bias in the kinetic analysis due to heterogeneity which might be caused by protein immobilization (22). Two binding regions on Paip2 interact selectively with defined PABP fragments.…”
Section: Characterization Of Pabp Binding Sites In Paip2mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Based on these three measurements and the fact that surface plasmon resonance is frequently known to underestimate affinities (20), we conclude that the affinity of CP for CARMIL is in the submicromolar range. If we assume a dissociation constant of ϳ0.4 M and use cellular concentrations for CP and CARMIL of ϳ1 M (21) and ϳ2 M (6), respectively, we calculate that about 75% the cellular CP could be complexed with CARMIL, barring some form of regulation or compartmentalization, and excluding other proteins that also bind CP (e.g.…”
Section: Fig 5 Sedimentation Equilibrium Analyses and Rsemmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…After formation of the boundary by slow acceleration to 15,000 rpm, the speed was decreased to 3,000 rpm for CARMIL and 5,000 rpm for CP, while maintaining the temperature at 20°C. Repetitive interference scans were taken 20 For sedimentation equilibrium runs in the XL-A, liquid columns of 0.080 or 0.110 ml of CARMIL in buffer A (with 0.015 ml more dialysate buffer A in the reference channel) and a speed of 7,500 rpm were used. Scans at 280 nm were collected at 2-h intervals in step mode (0.001-cm steps) with 11 or 13 averages/scan.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most obvious artifact is surface ligand heterogeneity; this can occur when more than one coupling site is present in the ligand molecule (46)(47)(48). The de novo designed E and K coils are relatively small peptides whose molecular weights vary from 2300 to 4100 Da, each of them containing multiple carboxyl and amino groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%