2003
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9884.00365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonsensical and biased correlation due to pooling heterogeneous samples

Abstract: The case of two variables is considered, where the sample consists of two heterogeneous groups. The behaviour of the pooled sample correlation coefficient is studied. The heterogeneity of the two groups may be interpreted as a hidden qualitative variable. It is shown that, even if the correlation is the same within both groups, the pooled correlation coefficient may be severely biased owing to heterogeneity of other group-specific parameters. In the case of uncorrelatedness, nonsensical correlation may arise f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to avoid nonsensical and biased correlation due to the pooling of heterogeneous samples (Hassler & Thadewald, 2003), the relationships between experimental measurements, hawthorn materials and extraction techniques are represented graphically using scatter plots ( Fig. 1a-j).…”
Section: In Vitro Antioxidant Activity -Total Phenol Content Dpph Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid nonsensical and biased correlation due to the pooling of heterogeneous samples (Hassler & Thadewald, 2003), the relationships between experimental measurements, hawthorn materials and extraction techniques are represented graphically using scatter plots ( Fig. 1a-j).…”
Section: In Vitro Antioxidant Activity -Total Phenol Content Dpph Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When ignored, these could obscure meaningful correlations and blur subgroup differences in task performance (White, Lott, & de Wit, 2006;Mohr, Krummenacher, et al, 2005;Kosslyn et al, 2002;Mattay et al, 2000;Mehta et al, 2000;Kimberg, DʼEsposito, & Farah, 1997;Fleming, Bigelow, Weinberger, & Goldberg, 1995). Furthermore, as Hassler and Thadewald (2003) pointed out, pooling data from heterogeneous samples bears the risk to produce misleading results due to "mean value artifacts" (see also the recent illustration by Hadzi-Pavlovic (2007). One source of individual variability in DA responsiveness may be genetically determined (Goldberg et al, 2003;Egan et al, 2001;Weinberger et al, 2001), and potential interactions between such genetic predispositions and an individualʼs attitude toward the paranormal are currently explored (Raz, Hines, Fossella, & Castro, 2008).…”
Section: Further Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 It has been established that severely biased linear relationships can occur owing to sample heterogeneity. 13 From a physiological viewpoint, it could be argued that the curtailed ability of the original 20mMST model to predict treadmill Vo 2max values might be attributed to differences in the exercise modes utilised in the validation procedures (that is, shuttle running v forward running). Findings from recent investigations suggested that Vo 2max during the 20mMST is significantly higher compared to a treadmill test.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%