2019
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2018101417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonsense shielding: protecting RNA from decay leads to cancer

Abstract: Despite intense scrutiny, the signals that determine whether a given RNA is degraded by the highly conserved and selective nonsense‐mediated RNA decay (NMD) pathway remain murky. In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Kishor et al shed light on this issue by demonstrating that the RNA‐binding protein, hnRNP L, protects a subset of RNAs from degradation by NMD. This mechanism is responsible for stabilizing the mRNA encoding the pro‐survival “oncogenic” protein, BCL‐2, in B‐cell lymphoma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, overall NMD efficiency has been suggested to be a compromise of balancing both efficiency with specificity and quality control with regulation [ 8 ]. Against the background of cell type and physiological situations, NMD thus specifically maintains a regulatory flexibility weighing the abundance of targets versus nontargets, the abundance of NMD factors and the abundance of feedback inducing proteins and mRNA features [ 8 , 228 , 229 ].…”
Section: To Nmd or Not To Nmd?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, overall NMD efficiency has been suggested to be a compromise of balancing both efficiency with specificity and quality control with regulation [ 8 ]. Against the background of cell type and physiological situations, NMD thus specifically maintains a regulatory flexibility weighing the abundance of targets versus nontargets, the abundance of NMD factors and the abundance of feedback inducing proteins and mRNA features [ 8 , 228 , 229 ].…”
Section: To Nmd or Not To Nmd?mentioning
confidence: 99%