Nonsedation or Light Sedation in Critically Ill, Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Abstract

BACKGROUND In critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients, daily interruption of sedation has been shown to reduce the time on ventilation and the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Data on whether a plan of no sedation, as compared with a plan of light sedation, has an effect on mortality are lacking. METHODS In a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, mechanically ventilated ICU patients to a plan of no sedation (nonsedation group) or to a plan of light sedation (i.e., to a level at which the patient was arousable, defined as a score of −2 to −3 on the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale [RASS], on which scores range from −5 [unresponsive] to +4 [combative]) (sedation group) with daily interruption. The primary outcome was mortality at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were the number of major thromboembolic events, the number of days free from coma or delirium, acute kidney injury according to severity, the number of ICU-free days, and the number of ventilator-free days. Between-group differences were calculated as the value in the nonsedation group minus the value in the sedation group. RESULTS A total of 710 patients underwent randomization, and 700 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The characteristics of the patients at baseline were similar in the two trial groups, except for the score on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, which was 1 point higher in the nonsedation group than in the sedation group, indicating a greater chance of in-hospital death. The mean RASS score in the nonsedation group increased from −1.3 on day 1 to −0.8 on day 7 and, in the sedation group, from −2.3 on day 1 to −1.8 on day 7. Mortality at 90 days was 42.4% in the nonsedation group and 37.0% in the sedated group (difference, 5.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −2.2 to 12.2; P = 0.65). The number of ICU-free days and of ventilator-free days did not differ significantly between the trial groups. The patients in the nonsedation group had a median of 27 days free from coma or delirium, and those in the sedation group had a median of 26 days free from coma or delirium. A major thromboembolic event occurred in 1 patient (0.3%) in the nonsedation group and in 10 patients (2.8%) in the sedation group (difference, −2.5 percentage points; 95% CI, −4.8 to −0.7 [unadjusted for multiple comparisons]). CONCLUSIONS Among mechanically ventilated ICU patients, mortality at 90 days did not differ significantly between those assigned to a plan of no sedation and those assigned to a plan of light sedation with daily interruption. (Funded by the Danish Medical Research Council and others; NONSEDA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01967680.

Excessive sedation as a risk factor for delirium: a comparison between two cohorts of critically-ill patients with and without COVID-19

“…Although literature suggests lighter sedation targets in critically-ill patients, certain conditions which require for the patient to be deeply sedated still exist, as for ARDS patients [5][6][7]. In general, severe ARDS patients frequently require neuromuscular blocking agents for adaptation to mechanical ventilation.…”

“…However, certain conditions may require deep sedation, among which is severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). It becomes therefore necessary to identify the correct balance between the required depth of sedation through precise titration of drug dosages while avoiding the possible complications correlated [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Measurement of the depth of sedation is the awake or arousable patient is possible through use of clinical assessment scales (such as the Richmont Agitation Sedation Scale [RASS]), but when sedation causes complete loss of consciousness, further assessment of sedation depth is no longer possible [15].…”

The neurologic consultation: pointers and takeaways for intensivists

“…Patients with prior IV infusions and organ dysfunction need time to wash these out. Physicians seldom account for these effects; recent evidence countermands these practices [6,7].…”

Effect of non‐sedation on post‐traumatic stress and psychological health in survivors of critical illness—A substudy of the NONSEDA randomized trial

“…The multicenter NONSEDA randomized trial assessed harms and benefits of non‐sedation versus sedation with a daily wake‐up call during mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients 8 . The aim of this sub‐study of the NONSEDA trial was to assess the effect of non‐sedation on post‐traumatic stress and psychological health 3 months after ICU discharge.…”