2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-012-3929-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonrigid parts’ specification and inspection methods: notions, challenges, and recent advancements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This principle can give way to a vast amount of restraining condition specification methods. Nevertheless, as proposed by Abenhaim et al [3], restrained condition specification methods can be classified into five methods contingent if the part is to be restrained:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This principle can give way to a vast amount of restraining condition specification methods. Nevertheless, as proposed by Abenhaim et al [3], restrained condition specification methods can be classified into five methods contingent if the part is to be restrained:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, recent trends in inspection methods for such non-rigid parts are focused on decreasing the inspection cost by removing the need for the use of dedicated inspection fixtures. An actively investigated approach by researchers in the field is referred to as the simulated displacements method [3]. This approach to the fixtureless inspection of nonrigid parts relies on a numerical approach to virtually compare the shape of the measured part in free-state condition with its nominal CAD model.…”
Section: By a Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, a flexible workpiece must be constrained or clamped during the measurement process in order to simulate the use state. To that end, expensive and special inspection fixtures need to be designed and manufactured [1]. On the other hand, some inspection stages cannot be fully automated with this conventional approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abenhaim et al [11] presented a review of the previous researches for the fixtureless inspection of non-rigid parts and proposed a classification of the specification methods used for the GD&T of non-rigid parts under the ASME and ISO standards. In the following, we will introduce the primary methods, based on the simulated displacement approach, developed for the geometric inspection of non-rigid parts without the use of inspection fixtures.…”
Section: Review Of Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This factor is a relative concept based on the relation between an imposed force and its persuaded displacement [11]. Based on the displacements of parts induced by a reasonable force (50 N) during inspection, the parts are considered rigid/non-rigid (flexible)/extremely non-rigid (see Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%