1997
DOI: 10.1063/1.532068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonrelativistic conformal groups. II. Further developments and physical applications

Abstract: The finite-dimensional conformal groups associated with the Galilei and (oscillating or expanding) Newton–Hooke space–time manifolds was characterized by the present authors in a recent work. Three isomorphic group families, one for each nonrelativistic kinematics, were obtained, whose members are labeled by a half-integer number l. Since the action of these groups on their corresponding space–time manifolds is only local, a linearization is introduced here such that the corresponding action is well defined ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will write the generator of the most general point transformation and will impose on it the condition of Noether symmetry, which gives the associated non-relativistic Killing equations that one must solve. For a massive non-relativistic particle, the maximal set of symmetries is larger than the Galilei group, and it is in fact the Schrödinger group [20,21], which is the group corresponding to the z = 2 case of an infinite set of z-Galilean conformal algebras [22][23][24].…”
Section: Jhep02(2017)049mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will write the generator of the most general point transformation and will impose on it the condition of Noether symmetry, which gives the associated non-relativistic Killing equations that one must solve. For a massive non-relativistic particle, the maximal set of symmetries is larger than the Galilei group, and it is in fact the Schrödinger group [20,21], which is the group corresponding to the z = 2 case of an infinite set of z-Galilean conformal algebras [22][23][24].…”
Section: Jhep02(2017)049mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we consider the conformal gauge λ = 1, µ = 0 the equations of motion becomė 24) and they should be supplemented with the constraints (3.5), (3.6). 4 We thank Paul Townsend for remarks concerning the boundary conditions.…”
Section: Jhep02(2017)049mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15,16]). It consists of rotations J, translations P , boosts B and time translations H which form the Galilean algebra, together with dilatations D, conformal transformations K and, finally, space dilatations D s .…”
Section: The Schrödinger Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Schrödinger group, when supplemented with space dilatation transformations becomes l = 1 2 member of the whole family of nonrelativistic conformal groups [15,16], indexed by halfinteger l. Various structural, geometric and physical aspects of the resulting Lie algebras have been intensively studied [17]- [35]. For l = N 2 , N-odd (N-even in the case of dimension two), the nonrelativistic conformal algebra admits central extension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it has been shown (see [30]) that when the relevant eigenfrequencies are proportional to consecutive odd integers then the maximal symmetry group of the PU oscillator is the l-conformal Newton-Hooke group with half-integer l = N − 1 2 , which is isomorphic to the l-conformal Galilei group (for this reason we will simply refer to it as the l-conformal non-relativistic group in what follows). These groups are natural conformal extensions of the NewtonHooke (Galilei) group, (in particular for N = 1 we obtain the Schrödinger one) and originally have been introduced in the context of non-relativistic gravity [31,32]; however, there are many dynamical models, both classical (including also the second order dynamical equations) and quantum, which exhibit such symmetries [33]- [41]. Furthermore, in a number of papers [42]- [49] infinite dimensional extensions of those symmetries, for fixed order l, have been also considered in the context of some more sophisticated models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%