2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevresearch.3.043226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonreciprocal frequency conversion with chiral Λ -type atoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4(a)]. Additionally, the emitter is assumed to be of giant atom form [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69], which couples to the waveguide at two points x ± of channel A (or B), as depicted in Fig. 4(b).…”
Section: Periodical Interference Behavior Modulated By Giant Emitter'...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4(a)]. Additionally, the emitter is assumed to be of giant atom form [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69], which couples to the waveguide at two points x ± of channel A (or B), as depicted in Fig. 4(b).…”
Section: Periodical Interference Behavior Modulated By Giant Emitter'...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to spinmomentum locking, the emitter chirally dissipates almost all its energy into one direction of the waveguide. Second, the emitter is considered as giant atom form, and couples to the waveguide at multiple sites [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69]. Given that emitters' frequency is below two degenerate minima points induced by the spin-orbit coupling, the bound states will be periodically modulated by giant atom's size due to quantum interference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the interaction at each atom-field coupling point can still be well described by the dipole approximation, the atoms in these systems can no longer be viewed as points and the phase accumulations of photons between different coupling points should be taken into account. To date, there have been a variety of intriguing phenomena witnessed in giant-atom structures, such as frequency-dependent Lamb shifts and relaxation rates [8], decoherence-free interatomic interactions [9,[11][12][13][14], unconventional bound states [15][16][17][18][19][20][21], and phase-controlled frequency conversions [22,23]. Most recently, giant atoms have also been extended to the nonperturbative regime [24], to chiral quantum optics [12-15, 25, 26], and to synthetic dimensions [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, such effects are ubiquitous and of course should be considered if the propagation time of photons between different coupling points is comparable to or even larger than the lifetime of the atom [6]. In this case, both the dynamic evolutions [6,16,28,29] and the scattering properties [23,30,31] of the giant atom exhibit significant non-Markovian features that have no counterparts in the Markovian regime, such as bound states that oscillate persistently between the giant atom and the one-dimensional continuum [16] and non-Markovianity induced nonreciprocity [23]. Moreover, non-Markovian retardation effects have also been well studied in systems featuring a semi-infinite waveguide, where a small atom placed in front of the waveguide end can be mapped into a giant atom with two identical coupling strengths [32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, much attention has been paid to the study of photon scattering in giant-atom waveguide-QED systems [58,[67][68][69][70]. In these systems, giant atoms can be engineered to couple with the waveguide at multiple points with large separation distance, and hence the dipole approximation is no longer valid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%