2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00515.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonrandom, Size‐ and Timing‐Biased Breeding in a Hatchery Population of Steelhead Trout

Abstract: Hatcheries have been built and operated to buffer salmon and trout populations from overfishing and to compensate for habitat lost or degraded by human activities. These facilities are now so prevalent that in some cases hatchery-produced salmon outnumber salmon produced in the wild. By default, this makes them an important component in the current ecology and evolution of salmonids. Hatcheries differ from natural environments in many ways, and among the most fundamental is the necessity that humans select fis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hendry et al 2004;Østbye et al 2004;Fraser & Bernatchez 2005;Hendry & Day 2005;McLean et al 2005), or size (e.g. McLean et al 2005). Given that there are no detectable differences in overall morphology, ecology, spawning behaviour and timing in T. moorii, and since local differences in natural selection are improbable, we consider colour-assortative mating based on female preferences as the most likely explanation for our finding of a marked degree of colour-assortative mating in T. moorii.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hendry et al 2004;Østbye et al 2004;Fraser & Bernatchez 2005;Hendry & Day 2005;McLean et al 2005), or size (e.g. McLean et al 2005). Given that there are no detectable differences in overall morphology, ecology, spawning behaviour and timing in T. moorii, and since local differences in natural selection are improbable, we consider colour-assortative mating based on female preferences as the most likely explanation for our finding of a marked degree of colour-assortative mating in T. moorii.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…McLennan & Ryan 1999), differences in spawning time and/or locality (e.g. Hendry et al 2004;Østbye et al 2004;Fraser & Bernatchez 2005;Hendry & Day 2005;McLean et al 2005), or size (e.g. McLean et al 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, males chosen by hatchery staff for spawning may be unsuitable in a manner discernable only by conspecific females (e.g., in poor condition; without 'good genes'), and individuals that would achieve few or no matings in the wild may be spawned preferentially in the hatchery (e.g., if few males were present on the spawning day, they were all spawned). When many males were present, smaller males tended to be excluded from spawning though the process was not systematic (McLean et al 2005); in BY 1996 81% of males were not spawned, in BY 1997 63% of males were not spawned and in BY 1998 21% of males were not spawned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Different factors should shape reproductive success in a salmonid hatchery, as selection is no longer imposed by competition, mate choice, and predation but human-related processes play a larger role (McLean et al 2005). Indeed, body size was statistically unrelated to reproductive success of male and female steelhead at Forks Creek Hatchery; however, both fecundity and reproductive timing affected the reproductive success of females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation