1997
DOI: 10.1063/1.474830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonrandom mixing in polymer blends: Implications for phase behavior

Abstract: Nearest-neighbor pair distribution functions are computed from the semiflexible chain lattice cluster theory (LCT) for binary polymer blends and are compared with the predictions of simple random mixing theory. The LCT treats lattice model polymers with structured monomers and with variable chain flexibility by allowing the monomers to extend over several lattice sites and by introducing trans ↔ gauche bending energies. Comparisons with Monte Carlo simulations for polymer melts enable further tests for the acc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, for a carefully selected system with chemically similar monomers, where x is positive but small, there exists a possibility for DV mix , 0. These predictions are consistent with the recent work of Foreman and Freed [7] using the lattice cluster model. Such situations, which would result in a previously unobserved pressure induced compatibilization, are the focus of this paper.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, for a carefully selected system with chemically similar monomers, where x is positive but small, there exists a possibility for DV mix , 0. These predictions are consistent with the recent work of Foreman and Freed [7] using the lattice cluster model. Such situations, which would result in a previously unobserved pressure induced compatibilization, are the focus of this paper.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…A similar increase of x s with P (,800 bars) was the origin of the decrease of the order-disorder phase transition in a diblock copolymer [16]. It is important to stress, as noted by Dudowicz and Freed [7], that a critical factor governing the thermodynamics of block copolymers is the junction point between the two blocks. Since a block copolymer is therefore a truly single component system, it is hard to relate its behavior to that of a blend, which is a physical mixture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The technical details and the diagrammatic representation of F blend for both fully flexible and semiflexible chain blends are described in a series of papers. 14,[19][20][21] A similar expression for the free energy of a melt follows directly from Eq. ͑8͒ by setting 1 ϭ and 2 ϭ0.…”
Section: Free Energy Of Binary Polymer Blendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The lattice cluster theory also describes the influence of chain semiflexibility on the properties of polymer blends. 14 The variation of blend thermodynamic properties and miscibility with chain semiflexibility is explained in the LCT by using a few rather simple effective geometrical parameters that depend on the monomer molecular structures and on the energy differences between trans and gauche conformations. The present comparisons of LCT calculations with SANS data demonstrate that the inclusion of chain semiflexibilty into the LCT significantly improves the ability of the theory to describe the temperature, pressure, and microstructure dependence of the SANS effective FH parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this formulation, the χ parameter is a convenient measure of the excess Gibbs free energy. The combined effects in χ include contributions possibly from enthalpic interactions, equation‐of‐state effects such as volume changes upon mixing, conformational entropy effects such as local packing, and noncombinatorial entropic terms 16, 28. As a result, although the χ parameter provides a standardized, conveniently comparable measure of blend interactions, it needs to be considered in terms of the relative importance of the various effects that are implicit in the definition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%