2005
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonradial and nonpolytropic astrophysical outflows

Abstract: Abstract. Exact axisymmetric analytical solutions of the governing MHD equations for magnetized and rotating outflows are applied to the solar wind during solar minimum as observed by ULYSSES. Using the spacecraft data, the latitudinal dependences of physical quantities such as the density, velocity, magnetic field and temperature are analytically described. The self-similar solutions are then compared to the global structure of the wind from one solar radius to 5 AU and beyond, including consistently the rota… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A combination of Ulysses measurements with a self-similar solar-wind model finds a scaled Alfvén Mach number MA of about 10 to 20 (Sauty et al 2005) consistent with our simpler scaling estimate in Section 3.3. The earlier self-similar model, however, suffered from inconsistencies in reproducing observed magneticfield values at 1 au, which could be resolved in a later update (Aibéo et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A combination of Ulysses measurements with a self-similar solar-wind model finds a scaled Alfvén Mach number MA of about 10 to 20 (Sauty et al 2005) consistent with our simpler scaling estimate in Section 3.3. The earlier self-similar model, however, suffered from inconsistencies in reproducing observed magneticfield values at 1 au, which could be resolved in a later update (Aibéo et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Not only are the fluctuations in the AM flux comparable to the average value, but from an instrument standpoint, small errors in determining the wind velocity translate to large errors in the AM flux (because the radial wind speed is 2-3 orders of magnitude larger than the typical tangential speed of 1-10km/s at 1au). The latter problem appears to be the main reason why data from most spacecraft have not been used to measure AM (see Figure 6 of Sauty et al 2005, which shows data from the Ulysses spacecraft; there is an approximately 1-year periodicty in the observations that is likely due to spacecraft pointing). The magnetic field direction is generally more accurately determined because it is not as radial as the flow, and the instruments used are less sensitive to spacecraft pointing than the particle detectors (which get different exposures as the spacecraft pointing changes).…”
Section: Spacecraft Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, observations of the solar wind by Ulysses also show that in situ rotation measurements are delicate. Sauty et al (2005) have plotted in Fig. 1 of their paper, the latitudinal variation of the rotation velocity of the flow, the absolute value of which is very small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%