2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/6983460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonpolypous Hamartomas of the Gastrointestinal Tract: An Updated Review on Classification, Denominations, and Clinical Management

Abstract: Purpose. To perform the first systematic report about histological subtypes of nonpolypous hamartomas of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, from esophagus to anal canal. Design. From over 19,000 studies about hamartomas, most of them published as case series or case presentations, we have selected the most representative ones for the GI tract, excluding polyposis syndromes. To have a whole picture of these hamartomas, all of the data were combined with the personal experience of the authors who are GI pathologis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 67 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagnostic criteria are based on a combination of personal and family history, endoscopic findings, and histologic features of the polyp. IFPs can be distinguished from a hamartomatous polyp by its typical morphology including spindle cell proliferation often forming perivascular cuffs with the presence of a prominent eosinophilic infiltrate and characteristic CD34 immunoreactivity [ 85 ]. Eosinophilic infiltration in the GI tract in the context of mass-forming lesions may create diagnostic confusion with IFP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnostic criteria are based on a combination of personal and family history, endoscopic findings, and histologic features of the polyp. IFPs can be distinguished from a hamartomatous polyp by its typical morphology including spindle cell proliferation often forming perivascular cuffs with the presence of a prominent eosinophilic infiltrate and characteristic CD34 immunoreactivity [ 85 ]. Eosinophilic infiltration in the GI tract in the context of mass-forming lesions may create diagnostic confusion with IFP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%