2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonpharmacologic Treatment for Children with Functional Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(145 reference statements)
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, there is a lack of systematic data for the fibre types that may be beneficial in terms of addressing the functional component of this disorder in children. A meta-analysis of 10 studies in a total of 690 children with functional constipation and a further follow-up study in 80 children evaluated the effect of seven different fibre mixtures with or without prebiotics compared with placebo or a control treatment 58. While the fibre types used in the studies perhaps did not reflect those most likely to offer a benefit for relief of constipation (ie, bulking fibre), a number of the prebiotic fibre combinations provided promising results 59.…”
Section: Role Of Fibre In the Management Of Children With Constipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there is a lack of systematic data for the fibre types that may be beneficial in terms of addressing the functional component of this disorder in children. A meta-analysis of 10 studies in a total of 690 children with functional constipation and a further follow-up study in 80 children evaluated the effect of seven different fibre mixtures with or without prebiotics compared with placebo or a control treatment 58. While the fibre types used in the studies perhaps did not reflect those most likely to offer a benefit for relief of constipation (ie, bulking fibre), a number of the prebiotic fibre combinations provided promising results 59.…”
Section: Role Of Fibre In the Management Of Children With Constipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of new prebiotic-fiber combinations provide some promising results. Further well-designed high-quality RCTs are needed before additional fiber intake can be recommended ( 9 ). Adding certain fibers to the diet may increase abdominal pain and flatulence, but the symptoms often decrease after several days.…”
Section: Functional Constipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding certain fibers to the diet may increase abdominal pain and flatulence, but the symptoms often decrease after several days. Sometimes gaseousness can be reduced by switching to another fiber supplement ( 9 ).…”
Section: Functional Constipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, treatment success rates and defecation frequency were not significantly different between groups. Therefore, there is currently no evidence for the routine addition of behavioral therapy in the treatment of childhood FC ( 32 , 34 ). On the other hand, FC has been reported to be more common in children with specific behavioral disorders such as autism and attention deficit disorders ( 35 , 36 ).…”
Section: Additional Non-pharmacological Treatment Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study compared biofeedback at home and in the clinical setting—both as add-on treatment to laxative treatment ( 40 ). A recent meta-analysis, including the three studies comparing add-on treatment with biofeedback to conventional treatment, detected considerable levels of heterogeneity and found no evidence for benefit of the addition of biofeedback in children with FC ( 34 ). Interestingly, there is evidence that biofeedback training is beneficial in adult patients with FC and dyssynergic defecation ( 41 , 42 ).…”
Section: Additional Non-pharmacological Treatment Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%