2022
DOI: 10.1007/jhep08(2022)178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonperturbative test of the Maldacena-Milekhin conjecture for the BMN matrix model

Abstract: We test a conjecture by Maldacena and Milekhin for the ungauged version of the Berenstein-Maldacena-Nastase (BMN) matrix model by lattice Monte Carlo simulation. The numerical results reproduce the perturbative and gravity results in the limit of large and small flux parameter, respectively, and are consistent with the conjecture.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the limit µ → 0, the deformation terms vanish and one expects the above model to converge to the BFSS model. This, however, assumes that there is no phase transition between the models, and indeed evidence until now supports this assumption [5,19,22]. Note also that the singlet constraint (3.4) is not affected by the deformation.…”
Section: Jhep03(2023)071mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the limit µ → 0, the deformation terms vanish and one expects the above model to converge to the BFSS model. This, however, assumes that there is no phase transition between the models, and indeed evidence until now supports this assumption [5,19,22]. Note also that the singlet constraint (3.4) is not affected by the deformation.…”
Section: Jhep03(2023)071mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…[19] and we reproduce the correct scaling of the internal energy of the gravitational system at low temperatures, which is the strongly-coupled regime of this model. Concerning numerical simulations, the usefulness of this specific model arises because the flat direction is under better control and simulations become stable at lower temperatures [5,[20][21][22]. At the same time, a drawback is that the dual geometry is not known analytically.…”
Section: Jhep03(2023)071mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations