2016
DOI: 10.32614/rj-2016-027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric Tests for the Interaction in Two-way Factorial Designs Using R

Abstract: An increasing number of R packages include nonparametric tests for the interaction in two-way factorial designs. This paper briefly describes the different methods of testing and reports the resulting p-values of such tests on datasets for four types of designs: between, within, mixed, and pretest-posttest designs. Potential users are advised only to apply tests they are quite familiar with and not be guided by p-values for selecting packages and tests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Violations are reported in the results section of the respective experiment if applicable. In case of violations, we report a nonparametric analogue of the mixed ANOVA using the ezPerm R function (version 4.4-0) to confirm our results [47].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Violations are reported in the results section of the respective experiment if applicable. In case of violations, we report a nonparametric analogue of the mixed ANOVA using the ezPerm R function (version 4.4-0) to confirm our results [47].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Brush allodynia and NPRS scores were assessed using a rank‐based nonparametric test in the ld.f2 function from the nparLD package, which reports Wald‐type test statistics for main and interaction effects . The ld.f2 function within the nparLD package is recommended for within‐within study designs . Significant main and interaction effects were assessed post‐hoc using Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests, with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…For the green house experiments repeated measures ANOVA was done to test for interactions between time and treatments. Repeated measures Friedman Ranks ANOVA were done using R software v. 3.5.3 (R Core Team, 2018) package npIntFactRep (Feys, 2015(Feys, , 2016 when ANOVA assumptions could not be met. In both approaches, the Greenhouse-Geisser correction was applied when sphericity was not achieved.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%