2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric specification tests for conditional duration models

Abstract: This paper deals with the testing of autoregressive conditional duration (ACD) models by gauging the distance between the parametric density and hazard rate functions implied by the duration process and their non-parametric estimates. We derive the asymptotic justification using the functional delta method for fixed and gamma kernels, and then investigate the finitesample properties through Monte Carlo simulations. Although our tests display some size distortion, bootstrapping suffices to correct the size with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the null is rejected because of an incorrectly assumed density function, the t and J-statistics will be significant, but they will not display any specific dynamic patterns. Finally, when the rejection comes from violations of both dependence and the density function, it will be desirable to combine our omnibus tests with tests that are powerful against violations of the null in a single direction, e.g., Escanciano (2008), Fernandes and Grammig (2005), and Hong (1996).…”
Section: Proposition 1 Letpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the null is rejected because of an incorrectly assumed density function, the t and J-statistics will be significant, but they will not display any specific dynamic patterns. Finally, when the rejection comes from violations of both dependence and the density function, it will be desirable to combine our omnibus tests with tests that are powerful against violations of the null in a single direction, e.g., Escanciano (2008), Fernandes and Grammig (2005), and Hong (1996).…”
Section: Proposition 1 Letpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other parametric and nonparametric tests, like those in Engle and Russell (1998), Fernandes and Grammig (2005), and Meitz and Terasvirta (2006), among others, that focus on a single hypothesis, either dynamic specification or density functional form. Thus, by focusing on a test with the same joint hypothesis we will be able to provide a fair comparison.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Autocontour Tests With Hong And Li's Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Developing a novel formal test for H 0 of a hypergeometric pole situation is beyond the scope of this paper. Though, we conjecture that using the results in Fernandes and Grammig (2005) for specification testing in the simple density case, the corresponding asymptotic distribution of the centered test statistic nb 2 D(x) + α x could be derived. However, as calculations are quite involved and should be complemented with a valid bootstrap approximation scheme for finite samples, we leave this for future research and a paper on its own.…”
Section: Choice Of Estimators For Different Density Shapes Near Zeromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dufour and Engle (2000) and Bauwens, Giot, Grammig, and Veredas (2004) evaluate the model's goodness-of-fit based on the evaluation of density forecasts using the probability integral transform as proposed by Diebold, Gunther, and Tay (1998). A nonparametric test against distributional misspecification is proposed by Fernandes and Grammig (2005) based on the work of Aït-Sahalia (1996).…”
Section: Statistical Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%