2018
DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2018.1429299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric inference for sensitivity of Haezendonck–Goovaerts risk measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Derivatives of distortion risk measures, applied to a model output in the direction of an input, have been extensively studied in sensitivity analysis and in capital allocation; notably by Hong (2009); Cont et al (2010) for the VaR risk measure, Hong and Liu (2009) for the ES risk measure and Tsanakas and Millossovich (2016) for general distortion risk measures. Sensitivity to linear portfolios summarized by Haezendonck-Goovaerts and entropic risk measures are considered in Wang et al (2018) and Tsanakas (2009), respectively. Cao and Wan (2017) analyse derivatives of expected utilities in connection to optimal portfolio selection, while Gourieroux et al (2000Gourieroux et al ( , 2006 consider directional derivatives of distortion risk measures with respect to parameter uncertainty for linear aggregation functions.…”
Section: Relation To Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Derivatives of distortion risk measures, applied to a model output in the direction of an input, have been extensively studied in sensitivity analysis and in capital allocation; notably by Hong (2009); Cont et al (2010) for the VaR risk measure, Hong and Liu (2009) for the ES risk measure and Tsanakas and Millossovich (2016) for general distortion risk measures. Sensitivity to linear portfolios summarized by Haezendonck-Goovaerts and entropic risk measures are considered in Wang et al (2018) and Tsanakas (2009), respectively. Cao and Wan (2017) analyse derivatives of expected utilities in connection to optimal portfolio selection, while Gourieroux et al (2000Gourieroux et al ( , 2006 consider directional derivatives of distortion risk measures with respect to parameter uncertainty for linear aggregation functions.…”
Section: Relation To Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original formulation was extended by Goovaerts et al [13] and by Bellini and Rosazza Gianin [4] to account for general (not necessarily positive) losses. The extended formulation is known under the name of Haezendonck-Goovaerts premium principle (or equivalently Haezendonck-Goovaerts risk measure) and has been the subject of extensive study in the literature, see Bellini and Rosazza Gianin [5] and [6], Goovaerts et al [15], Mao and Hu [18], Tang and Yang [21] and [22], Zhu et al [26], Ahn and Shyamalkumar [1], Peng et al [20], Wang and Peng [24], Liu et al [17], Wang et al [23]. Moreover, we refer to the general survey by Goovaerts and Laeven [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%