2009
DOI: 10.1214/09-lnms5712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric Estimation of Hemodynamic Response Function: A Frequency Domain Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. It will be interesting to compare our procedure when it is adapted to the spatio-temporal regularization method [17], the nonparametric method based on orthonormal causal Laguerre polynomials [14], the wavelet approach [12], the spline method [19], and the coherence based method [1]. 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. It will be interesting to compare our procedure when it is adapted to the spatio-temporal regularization method [17], the nonparametric method based on orthonormal causal Laguerre polynomials [14], the wavelet approach [12], the spline method [19], and the coherence based method [1]. 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is spatio-temporal regularization method [17], nonparametric methods such as those based on orthonormal causal Laguerre polynomials [14], wavelet approach [12], spline methods [5; 19; 18], and the frequency domain coherence based method [1]. There are also data-driven and model-driven methods [9; 13].…”
Section: Figure 2 a Block Design Stimulus S(·) (Left) A Model Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model (1) without the term of the 2nd-order Volterra kernel is the GLM (Friston et al, 1995). There is a vast literature on the estimation of the HRF h i,k ( t ), including parametric methods (e.g., Worsley and Friston, 1995; Friston et al, 1998a; Glover, 1999; Henson et al, 2002; Riera et al, 2004; Lindquist and Wager, 2007; Lindquist et al, 2009) and nonparametric methods (e.g., Aguirre et al, 1998; Dale, 1999; Lange et al, 1999; Woolrich et al, 2004; Zarahn, 2002; Vakorin et al, 2007; Bai et al, 2009; Wang et al, 2011). Estimation of V i , k 1 k 2 ( t 1 , t 2 ) is more challenging than that of the HRF, because the Volterra kernel function, defined on the two-dimensional space, involves many more parameters, while the number of observations, T , for each subject is usually limited.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, in the frequency domain, MASM assumes that ϕY(f,d)=<ϕboldH(f,d),ϕboldX(f)>+ϕε(f,d), where ϕ H ( f, d ) = (ϕ H 1 ( f, d ),…, ϕ H m ( f, d )) T , ϕ X ( f ) = (ϕ X 1 ( f ),…, ϕ X m ( f )) T . An advantage of MASM in (2) is that the temporal correlation structure can be reduced since the Fourier coefficients are approximately asymptotically uncorrelated across frequencies under some regularity conditions [8,1]. Moreover, ϕ ε ( f, d ) is assumed to be a complex process with the zero mean function and a finite spatial covariance structure.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%