2014
DOI: 10.5351/csam.2014.21.1.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric Estimation of Distribution Function using Bezier Curve

Abstract: In this paper we suggest an efficient method to estimate the distribution function using the Bezier curve, and compare it with existing methods by simulation studies. In addition, we suggest a robust version of crossvalidation criterion to estimate the number of Bezier points, and showed that the proposed method is better than the existing methods based on simulation studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kim et al (2000) applied Bezier curve smoothing to the estimation of the measurement error model. Further use of the Bezier curve are the smoothing of the KaplanMeier estimator (Kim et al, 2003), the smoothing of the bivariate Kaplan-Meier estimator (Bae et al, 2005), the selection of Bezier points in density estimation and regression (Kim and Park, 2012) and the nonparametric estimation of distribution function using the Bezier curve (Bae et al, 2014). Note that the kernel smoothing has a poor performance at the boundary, especially in the survival function estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al (2000) applied Bezier curve smoothing to the estimation of the measurement error model. Further use of the Bezier curve are the smoothing of the KaplanMeier estimator (Kim et al, 2003), the smoothing of the bivariate Kaplan-Meier estimator (Bae et al, 2005), the selection of Bezier points in density estimation and regression (Kim and Park, 2012) and the nonparametric estimation of distribution function using the Bezier curve (Bae et al, 2014). Note that the kernel smoothing has a poor performance at the boundary, especially in the survival function estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%