2002
DOI: 10.1198/016214502753479310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric Estimation of a Distribution Subject to a Stochastic Precedence Constraint

Abstract: For any two random variables X and Y with distributions F and G de ned on 601ˆ5, X is said to stochastically precede Y if P4X µ Y 5 ¶ 1=2. For independent X and Y , stochastic precedence (denoted by X µ sp Y ) is equivalent to E6G4Xƒ57 µ 1=2. The applicability of stochastic precedence in various statistical contexts, including reliability modeling, tests for distributional equality versus various alternatives, and the relative performance of comparable tolerance bounds, is discussed. The problem of estimating … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arcones et al 42 argued that stochastic ordering is a too strong assumption to be used practically since it assumes uniform domination of one distribution over another. They introduce the concept of precedence ordering.…”
Section: Future Research: Precedence Orderingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arcones et al 42 argued that stochastic ordering is a too strong assumption to be used practically since it assumes uniform domination of one distribution over another. They introduce the concept of precedence ordering.…”
Section: Future Research: Precedence Orderingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arcones et al (2002) introduced stochastic precedence, a weaker constraint than stochastic order, which builds the restriction through Pr(X 1 ≤ X 2 ) for two independent random variables X 1 and X 2 with distribution functions F 1 and F 2 , respectively. Specifically, X 1 is said to stochastically precede X 2 if Pr(X 1 ≤ X 2 ) ≥ 0.5, denoted by X 1 ≤ sp X 2 or, equivalently, F 1 ≤ sp F 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the normal distribution is stochastic precedence constrained with respect to its mean, in particular, N(θ 1 , σ 2 1 ) ≤ sp N(θ 2 , σ 2 2 ) if and only if θ 1 ≤ θ 2 , with no further restriction needed on the variances σ 2 1 and σ 2 2 . Arcones et al (2002) discussed potential applications for stochastic precedence, and developed classical nonparametric stochastic precedence constrained estimators for F 1 (with F 2 assumed known) and for both F 1 and F 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interest of this concept for applications has been pointed out several times in the literature (see in particular [1], [3] and [9]). We recall the reader's attention on the fact that stochastic precedence does not define a stochastic order in that, for instance, it is not transitive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When X 1 , X 2 are independent the implication X 1 st X 2 ⇒ X 1 sp X 2 holds (see [1]). It is also easy to find several other examples of bivariate probability models where the same implication holds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%