2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11222-017-9748-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric estimation for compound Poisson process via variational analysis on measures

Abstract: The paper develops new methods of nonparametric estimation of a compound Poisson process. Our key estimator for the compounding (jump) measure is based on series decomposition of functionals of a measure and relies on the steepest descent technique. Our simulation studies for various examples of such measures demonstrate flexibility of our methods. They are particularly suited for discrete jump distributions, not necessarily concentrated on a grid nor on the positive or negative semi-axis. Our estimators also … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Buchmann and Grübel (2004) establish weak convergence of their modified estimator, but on the downside its asymptotic distribution is unwieldy to give confidence statements on p. Most importantly, the plug-in approaches in Buchmann and Grübel (2003) and Buchmann and Grübel (2004) do not allow obvious generalisations to non-uniformly spaced observation times {t i }. In Lindo et al (2018), another frequentist estimator of the jump measure is introduced, that is obtained via the steepest descent technique as a solution to an optimisation problem over the cone of positive measures. The emphasis in Lindo et al (2018) is on numerical aspects; again, no obvious generalisation to the case of non-uniform {t i } is available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Buchmann and Grübel (2004) establish weak convergence of their modified estimator, but on the downside its asymptotic distribution is unwieldy to give confidence statements on p. Most importantly, the plug-in approaches in Buchmann and Grübel (2003) and Buchmann and Grübel (2004) do not allow obvious generalisations to non-uniformly spaced observation times {t i }. In Lindo et al (2018), another frequentist estimator of the jump measure is introduced, that is obtained via the steepest descent technique as a solution to an optimisation problem over the cone of positive measures. The emphasis in Lindo et al (2018) is on numerical aspects; again, no obvious generalisation to the case of non-uniform {t i } is available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Lindo et al (2018), another frequentist estimator of the jump measure is introduced, that is obtained via the steepest descent technique as a solution to an optimisation problem over the cone of positive measures. The emphasis in Lindo et al (2018) is on numerical aspects; again, no obvious generalisation to the case of non-uniform {t i } is available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%