2000
DOI: 10.2307/2669470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric Density Estimation from Biased Data with Unknown Biasing Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our semiparametric formulation allows us to think about density deconvolution in terms of sampling bias, in that our data are drawn from density g 0 when our target is f 0 (Lloyd & Jones, 2000). Sampling from g 0 is equivalent to drawing candidate observations from f 0 and then accepting each with a probability proportional to 1/ w 0 .…”
Section: Weighted Kernel Estimation For the Semiparametric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our semiparametric formulation allows us to think about density deconvolution in terms of sampling bias, in that our data are drawn from density g 0 when our target is f 0 (Lloyd & Jones, 2000). Sampling from g 0 is equivalent to drawing candidate observations from f 0 and then accepting each with a probability proportional to 1/ w 0 .…”
Section: Weighted Kernel Estimation For the Semiparametric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overlap T ∩ T ′ provides some information about w and hence allows both f and w to be estimable nonparametrically in the range of T ∩ T ′ . See Lloyd and Jones [12], Wang and Sun [25], for more information on nonparametric estimates of f and w, based on two biased samples.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simpler model-based approaches to analysis of ascertained data have been described previously. Rosenbaum (1987) described sampling weights modeled as a function of data descriptive of class/stratum features; Reilly, Gelman, and Katz (2001) used a similar approach applied to a time series of weekly political polling data; and Lloyd and Jones (2000) corrected for sampling bias in nonparametric density estimation using two samples from the population, both biased by the same function.…”
Section: Models and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%