2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2007.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric background generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tables 1 and 2 show the number addition of the SDGD filter in the BGS techniques. Then the values of recall, precision, and F-score were calculated based on mathematical equations (10)- (12). Based on the findings shown in Tables 1 and 2, we can see that the number of TPs has increased significantly, which proves that our technique is able to detect more of the compound blob than the original methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tables 1 and 2 show the number addition of the SDGD filter in the BGS techniques. Then the values of recall, precision, and F-score were calculated based on mathematical equations (10)- (12). Based on the findings shown in Tables 1 and 2, we can see that the number of TPs has increased significantly, which proves that our technique is able to detect more of the compound blob than the original methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Prior research on background subtraction (BGS) used several parametric BGS techniques, such as running average [2][3][4], running Gaussian average [5][6][7], approximate median filter [7,8], and Gaussian Mixture Model [9][10][11]. These parametric techniques determine the foreground and update the subsequent background based on the distribution of intensity value [12]. Aside from these techniques, other studies have introduced nonparametric models that detect foreground and background based on the intensity of statistical properties [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative analysis is compared with Top-Hat, TDLMS [14], nonparametric background method [15], anisotropic background prediction (ABP) method [16], single Gaussian (SG) [17], fuzzy running average (FRA) [18], and mixed of Gaussian (MoG) [19]. The three indicators MSE, SSIM, and GSNR are used to evaluate the background prediction effect of the infrared images.…”
Section: Background Prediction Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 5 × 5 "square" structure is adopted for Top-Hat. The settings for other methods are referenced from the literature [14][15][16][17][18][19]. The experimental results are listed from Tables 2-5.…”
Section: Background Prediction Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation