2008
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0b013e3180342023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonoperative Treatment of Multiple Intra-Abdominal Solid Organ Injury After Blunt Abdominal Trauma

Abstract: Lactate levels at admission, solid viscus score, necessity of transfusion, crystalloid resuscitation, and a drop in the hematocrit in the first hour after admission are useful parameters for judging the failure of NOM. Although there is a higher failure rate of NOM in multiple solid organ injury, NOM can still be considered in these cases with extra caution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
75
3
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
75
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the number is small, this may support the contention that selected patients with higher-grade injuries to multiple solid organs can be managed non-operatively. Yanar et al [15] reported that multiplicity of solid organ injury is not a predictive marker of NOM failure, and subset analysis of organ combination revealed no association with NOM failure. In our study, 17 patients (21.25%) with grade III and IV injury were treated with NOM successfully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the number is small, this may support the contention that selected patients with higher-grade injuries to multiple solid organs can be managed non-operatively. Yanar et al [15] reported that multiplicity of solid organ injury is not a predictive marker of NOM failure, and subset analysis of organ combination revealed no association with NOM failure. In our study, 17 patients (21.25%) with grade III and IV injury were treated with NOM successfully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] showed that the rate of failure was 1.1%, the incidence of bowel or diaphragm injuries in association with spleen or liver injury in patients undergoing laparotomy after blunt trauma was reported between 0.5% and 12% in the literature. [13,14] Yanar et al [15] reported one patient for whom NOM failed because of the mesenteric laceration. In our study, one patient (1.25%) was overlooked and had to be operated on due todeterioration of the general condition during the clinical follow-up and small bowel injury was detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This poses a new set of challenges with regards to observation of these patients and management of their potential complications. 5,6 In our study of NOM, age and sex of the patient did not have any influence on the outcome. Majority of our patients were male and maximum number of patients was in the age group of 21 to 40 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In most cases, treatment of injuries has shifted from early surgical treatment to NOM. NOM of blunt abdominal injuries is well established and strategies based on hemodynamic stability and CT scan findings are now widely used in the treatment of solid organ injuries [3][4][5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past three decades multiple studies have shown that NOM of solid organ injuries is effective, with a reported success rate of more than 90% [3][4][5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%