1997
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199704000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonoperative Management of Esophageal Perforations

Abstract: NOT can be suggested for the treatment of intramural perforations. In the case of transmural perforation, this approach should be taken into consideration if the esophageal lesion is circumscribed, is not in neoplastic tissue, is not in the abdominal cavity, and is not accompanied by simultaneous obstructive esophageal disease; in addition, symptoms and signs of septicemia should be absent.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
121
0
14

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
121
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to poor results in post dilatation malignant perforations, we avoid dilatation and favour feeding jejunostomy for nutrition. Though Iannettoni and associates [2] advocated oesophagectomy even if the stricture is a dilatable corrosive stricture for better functional results, we in our institution are inclined towards preservation of oesophagus except in perforations associated with malignancy According to Orringer et al [13] the approach for oesophagectomy (transthoracic versus transhiatal) is dictated by the chronicity of the perforation, presence and degree of pleural contamination and surgeon experience. We prefer transhiatal resection because postoperative pulmonary complications are minimal, as most of our patients have compromised lung function and nutrition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Due to poor results in post dilatation malignant perforations, we avoid dilatation and favour feeding jejunostomy for nutrition. Though Iannettoni and associates [2] advocated oesophagectomy even if the stricture is a dilatable corrosive stricture for better functional results, we in our institution are inclined towards preservation of oesophagus except in perforations associated with malignancy According to Orringer et al [13] the approach for oesophagectomy (transthoracic versus transhiatal) is dictated by the chronicity of the perforation, presence and degree of pleural contamination and surgeon experience. We prefer transhiatal resection because postoperative pulmonary complications are minimal, as most of our patients have compromised lung function and nutrition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the present series, use of CT scan with oral contrast resulted in early diagnosis and intervention leading to a mortality as low as 9%. Non-operative management was used in 14 patients who met the criteria of Cameron [11] and Altorjay [2]. Recent, contained perforations in stable patients with minimal signs and symptoms were subjected to non-operative treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations