2015
DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.166801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonoperative management of craniovertebral junction and cutaneous tuberculosis

Abstract: Background:Craniovertebral junction (CVJ) and cutaneous tuberculosis (TB) are both rare, each occurring in 0.3–1.0% of patients. To our knowledge, there are no existing cases reporting these manifestations of TB simultaneously. We report a case of TB involving the left CVJ as well as the skin, and discuss our management while providing a review of the literature.Case Description:An adult patient was presented with progressive nocturnal neck pain associated with the development of several skin lesions. Investig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…highlighted the nonoperative management for CVJ tuberculosis and wrote that tissue biopsy is helpful only where drug-resistant tuberculosis is suspected. [ 21 ] In our experience, a contrast-enhanced MRI with ESR and lymphocytosis is sufficient to diagnose and start treatment. A clinical improvement, particularly a sharp decrease in the pain along with overall improvement in general health, indicates a good response to ATT, even in the face of unchanged radiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…highlighted the nonoperative management for CVJ tuberculosis and wrote that tissue biopsy is helpful only where drug-resistant tuberculosis is suspected. [ 21 ] In our experience, a contrast-enhanced MRI with ESR and lymphocytosis is sufficient to diagnose and start treatment. A clinical improvement, particularly a sharp decrease in the pain along with overall improvement in general health, indicates a good response to ATT, even in the face of unchanged radiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%