Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1997
DOI: 10.1084/jem.185.8.1413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonmitogenic Anti-CD3 Monoclonal Antibodies Deliver a Partial T Cell Receptor Signal and Induce Clonal Anergy

Abstract: Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are potent immunosuppressive agents used in clinical transplantation. However, the activation-related adverse side effects associated with these mAbs have prompted the development of less toxic nonmitogenic anti-CD3 mAb therapies. At present, the functional and biochemical consequences of T cell exposure to nonmitogenic anti-CD3 is unclear. In this study, we have examined the early signaling events triggered by a nonmitogenic anti-CD3 mAb. Like the mitogenic anti-CD3 mAb, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

10
124
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
10
124
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5A, when splenocytes from CD95LP-Luc ϫ D011.10 mice are exposed initially to either the 323-336 or 324 -334 peptide, then washed and restimulated with only the agonistic 323-339 peptide, a marked inhibition of T cell proliferation results. This observation is consistent with results generated in systems using other models of TCR antagonism (49,50).…”
Section: Differential Requirements For Induction Of Proliferation Vs supporting
confidence: 82%
“…5A, when splenocytes from CD95LP-Luc ϫ D011.10 mice are exposed initially to either the 323-336 or 324 -334 peptide, then washed and restimulated with only the agonistic 323-339 peptide, a marked inhibition of T cell proliferation results. This observation is consistent with results generated in systems using other models of TCR antagonism (49,50).…”
Section: Differential Requirements For Induction Of Proliferation Vs supporting
confidence: 82%
“…In particular, naive T cells are resistant to anergy induction by Ag pulsed on 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide-fixed APC, a classical protocol leading to unresponsiveness of T cell clones (37). Similarly, exposure of naive T cells to ionomycin and nonmitogenic anti-CD3 mAbs failed to induce T cell unresponsiveness (38,39), supporting the notion that these cells are insensitive to multiple forms of anergy induction. These observations are in marked contrast with studies performed with mitogenic anti-CD3⑀ mAbs, demonstrating the sensitivity of naive T cells to this form of anergy induction (14,15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The in vivo T cell-activating properties of these Abs depend on multivalent TCR cross-linking mediated via binding of the Ab Fc domains to FcRbearing cells (5). F(abЈ) 2 (6), or Abs with isotypes that do not bind FcR (7)(8)(9), allow only divalent TCR cross-linking, leading to partial signaling, Th cell hyporesponsiveness, and suppression of autoimmunity in mice (10,11). However, these nonmitogenic Abs affect all Th cells and therefore may have undesirable global immunosuppressive effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%