2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-011-3_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonmammalian Parent-of-Origin Effects

Abstract: Chromosomes acquire different epigenetic marks during oogenesis and spermatogenesis. After fertilization, if retained and selected, these differences may result in imprinting effects. Rather than being an oddity, imprinting effects have been found in many sexually reproducing organisms. Interestingly, imprinting can result in disparate effects under different selective forces. At the same time, epigenetic mechanisms and selective pressures shared by sexually reproducing organisms could underlie common imprinti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we show genome-wide parent-of-origin expression in an insect whereby maternally inherited chromosomes are the main contributors to transcriptomic activity in males. In recent years, a number of studies have considered genomic imprinting beyond mammals and flowering plants ( de la Casa-Esperón 2012 ; MacDonald 2012 ). We now have several allele-specific studies of imprinted gene expression (or lack thereof) in insects ( Coolon et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we show genome-wide parent-of-origin expression in an insect whereby maternally inherited chromosomes are the main contributors to transcriptomic activity in males. In recent years, a number of studies have considered genomic imprinting beyond mammals and flowering plants ( de la Casa-Esperón 2012 ; MacDonald 2012 ). We now have several allele-specific studies of imprinted gene expression (or lack thereof) in insects ( Coolon et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A positive correlation between number of crossovers and SC length has also been observed between different inbred strains of mice (Baier et al 2014;Lynn et al 2002). These intraspecific studies suggest that genetic differences, as well as chromatin packaging changes, underlie differences in crossover frequency (Baier et al 2014;de la Casa-Esperon 2012;de la Casa-Esperon and Sapienza 2003;Kleckner 2006;Kleckner et al 2003). Among the few loci identified in mice that control recombination rate (Balcova et al 2016;Baudat et al 2010;de la Casa-Esperon et al 2002;Myers et al 2010;Parvanov et al 2010), Prdm9 codes for a histone methyltransferase that determines recombination hotspots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%