2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2734549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlocal optical effects on the fluorescence and decay rates for admolecules at a metallic nanoparticle

Abstract: A phenomenological model is implemented to study the decay rates of fluorescing molecules in the vicinity of a metallic nanoparticle, wherein the nonlocal optical response of the particle is accounted for via the hydrodynamic model for the description of the free electrons in the metal. These nonlocal effects are examined for each of the radiative rate and the nonradiative rate of the admolecule, respectively. In addition, the overall fluorescence rate which includes the enhancement ratio for the driving field… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The charge distribution for the LSP peak is also shown (marked with "Y"), and we see from the contour plot that although it is indeed a surface plasmon it also displays the pattern of a confined bulk plasmon. The reason is that the LSP resonance hybridizes with the b-fluid bulk plasmon marked by [2,4], resulting in a charge distribution with features from both surface and bulk plasmons. Such a hybridization would never take place in the HDM where the surface plasmons always are clearly separated in frequency from the bulk plasmons.…”
Section: A Features In the Extinction Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The charge distribution for the LSP peak is also shown (marked with "Y"), and we see from the contour plot that although it is indeed a surface plasmon it also displays the pattern of a confined bulk plasmon. The reason is that the LSP resonance hybridizes with the b-fluid bulk plasmon marked by [2,4], resulting in a charge distribution with features from both surface and bulk plasmons. Such a hybridization would never take place in the HDM where the surface plasmons always are clearly separated in frequency from the bulk plasmons.…”
Section: A Features In the Extinction Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But when the sizes approach the nanoscale, the model is no longer able to explain experimentally observable phenomena like, for example, the blueshift of the resonance frequency of the localized surface plasmon (LSP) in metallic nanospheres [1]. An improved model that has been successful in describing the optical properties of metals on the nanoscale is the hydrodynamic Drude model (HDM) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. In this model, the polarization depends nonlocally on the electrical field, and the aforementioned blueshift appears as a size-dependent nonlocal effect [7,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect has been reported in the literature for a molecule placed in the vicinity of a planar surface, [11][12][13] a cavity, 14 a photonic crystal, 15,16 an optical probe, 17 and a nanoparticle. 18,19 This mechanism, usually referred to as molecular fluorescence [20][21][22] or the Purcell effect, 23 is meant to describe how the lifetime of a molecular excited state is not only a function of the molecule itself, but also of its surrounding environment. The lifetime is modified by both the radiative decay rate, due to photon emission, and the non-radiative decay rate, due to energy dissipation into the surrounding environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will also assume a local description of matter and use throughout the paper the Drude's dispersion law, ε (ω) = 1 − ω 2 pl ω(ω+i/τ ) , with ω pl = 15.8eV and (ω pl τ ) −1 = 0.04(Al). These assumptions are not very good for small enough nanoparticles (size less than 5 nm), where a nonlocal dielectric response of the nanoparticle (see [23]) and a radius-dependent imaginary part of the dielectric function (see, e.g., [24]) should be taken into account. So, our results can be used for nanoparticles in the range between 5 and 100 nm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%