2017
DOI: 10.1109/tcsvt.2016.2556498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlocal Gradient Sparsity Regularization for Image Restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the non-local mean theory, Dong et al [22] propose the non-local centralized sparse representation model to obtain the estimation of the sparse coding coefficients of the original image. By taking advantage of the non-local similarity of natural images, Liu et al [23] formulate the sparsity of the image gradient with pixel-wise content-adaptive distributions to reflect the non-stationary nature of image statistics. Daniel and Weiss [24] propose the Expected Patch Log Likelihood (EPLL) method by using a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) prior, which trains clean image patches to regularize degraded image patches.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using the non-local mean theory, Dong et al [22] propose the non-local centralized sparse representation model to obtain the estimation of the sparse coding coefficients of the original image. By taking advantage of the non-local similarity of natural images, Liu et al [23] formulate the sparsity of the image gradient with pixel-wise content-adaptive distributions to reflect the non-stationary nature of image statistics. Daniel and Weiss [24] propose the Expected Patch Log Likelihood (EPLL) method by using a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) prior, which trains clean image patches to regularize degraded image patches.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, D denotes the directional difference operator, D h j and D v j denote the horizontal and vertical directions respectively. Inspired by [23], the gradient difference between the target patch and similar patches is regularized by the total variation that is a typical L 1 -norm and has better performance in handling the directionality of the image. It can ensure the accuracy of prediction to avoid the disadvantage of the traditional total variation, which simply makes the regularization on the patch itself as zero.…”
Section: Patch-based Nonlocal Gradient Priormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…China; Tel: 0938-8366657; E-mail: xdlq@163.com image quality. The observed image is usually the degradation image under factors of the noise, fuzzy, sports translation [3]. The classic image restoration process is based on prior knowledge to build an image degradation model, and then a variety of the degradation processing methods are adopted to make the image quality improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%