2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.75.172503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlocal Andreev reflection at high transmissions

Abstract: We analyze non-local effects in electron transport across three-terminal normal-superconductingnormal (NSN) structures. Subgap electrons entering S-electrode from one N-metal may form Cooper pairs with their counterparts penetrating from another N-metal. This phenomenon of crossed Andreev reflection -combined with normal scattering at SN interfaces -yields two different contributions to non-local conductance which we evaluate non-perturbatively at arbitrary interface transmissions. Both these contributions rea… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

10
97
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
10
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cooper pairs in superconducting nanostructures provide a potential source of entangled electrons [1,2,3,4,5], a possibility that has been recently explored in conventional superconductors both theoretically [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16] and experimentally [17,18,19,20]. In a typical experimental device, a superconducting region is contacted by several metallic electrodes at nanoscale distances with the aim of analyzing the non-local transport properties at subgap voltages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooper pairs in superconducting nanostructures provide a potential source of entangled electrons [1,2,3,4,5], a possibility that has been recently explored in conventional superconductors both theoretically [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16] and experimentally [17,18,19,20]. In a typical experimental device, a superconducting region is contacted by several metallic electrodes at nanoscale distances with the aim of analyzing the non-local transport properties at subgap voltages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This noncollinearity is particularly important for nonlocal transport processes where the wire length is typically comparable to the superconducting coherence length [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. In general, when an electron is injected from one N lead to the S, it can either form a Cooper pair in the S and leave an out-going hole in the other N lead; or it can propagate through the S to the other lead.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, when an electron is injected from one N lead to the S, it can either form a Cooper pair in the S and leave an out-going hole in the other N lead; or it can propagate through the S to the other lead. These two different processes respectively correspond to the cross Andreev reflection (CAR) [10,11] and the direct charge transfer [13], which can be differentiated and respectively blocked in a noncollinear nonlocal transport. A paradigm scenario here is by placing two HM leads in contact with the wire (see Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elastic cotunneling (EC) is to lowest order in tunneling amplitude equal in magnitude and opposite in sign to CAR, resulting in a vanishing nonlocal conductance [8]. Including higher order terms, which become important in more transparent junctions, unfortunately provides EC to be the dominant process [9].Several proposals have been put forward to enhance the CAR current. Using ferromagnetic half-metals (F) as leads can result in dominant CAR in an antiparallel magnetization alignment [3], though spin entanglement is then questionable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elastic cotunneling (EC) is to lowest order in tunneling amplitude equal in magnitude and opposite in sign to CAR, resulting in a vanishing nonlocal conductance [8]. Including higher order terms, which become important in more transparent junctions, unfortunately provides EC to be the dominant process [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%