2021
DOI: 10.3390/math9243165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinearly Preconditioned FETI Solver for Substructured Formulations of Nonlinear Problems

Abstract: We consider the finite element approximation of the solution to elliptic partial differential equations such as the ones encountered in (quasi)-static mechanics, in transient mechanics with implicit time integration, or in thermal diffusion. We propose a new nonlinear version of preconditioning, dedicated to nonlinear substructured and condensed formulations with dual approach, i.e., nonlinear analogues to the Finite Element Tearing and Interconnecting (FETI) solver. By increasing the importance of local nonli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Algorithmic methods do not involve the inclusion of any additional functional block or element in the structure of the measuring instrument and are based only on the processing of information from the measuring instrument by certain algorithms by a microprocessor computing device within the system [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Analysis Of Recent Research and Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithmic methods do not involve the inclusion of any additional functional block or element in the structure of the measuring instrument and are based only on the processing of information from the measuring instrument by certain algorithms by a microprocessor computing device within the system [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Analysis Of Recent Research and Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, linearization is a linear approximation to a given equation. Although mathematical functions have different distributions specific to their structures, linearization is required to analyze and generalize these formulas [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 ranges from 0.228 to 0.106 indicating deviation around 12.2%. Cubic and quadratic are the best fitted models, whereas compound, growth and exponential are the less fitted models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally introduced in [5,6], they are nonlinear generalizations of standard FETI-DP domain decomposition methods [22]. Related methods are, e.g., nonlinear BDDC (Balancing Domain Decomposition by Constraints) methods [10,11], nonlinear FETI-1 methods [18,19,21], ASPIN (Additive Schwarz Preconditioned Inexact Newton) methods [3], or ASPEN (Additive Schwarz Preconditioned Exact Newton) methods [4,9]. Nonlinear FETI-DP domain decomposition methods are robust and scalable [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%