1994
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3800(94)90016-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear time series analysis of empirical population dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), though we would argue that measles provides a less cluttered path between data and mechanistic models than most other systems. Childhood infections have also been a key test bed for understanding dynamical systems and associated statistical methodologies at the population level (Schaffer and Kot 1985, Casdagli 1991, Rand and Wilson 1991, Stone 1992, Drepper et al 1994, Grenfell et al 1994, Stone et al 1996, Finkenstädt and Grenfell 2000. In this paper, we presented a modeling framework that weds the theoretical and statistical approaches through a mechanistic, stochastic model for measles epidemics (see also Finkenstädt and Grenfell 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), though we would argue that measles provides a less cluttered path between data and mechanistic models than most other systems. Childhood infections have also been a key test bed for understanding dynamical systems and associated statistical methodologies at the population level (Schaffer and Kot 1985, Casdagli 1991, Rand and Wilson 1991, Stone 1992, Drepper et al 1994, Grenfell et al 1994, Stone et al 1996, Finkenstädt and Grenfell 2000. In this paper, we presented a modeling framework that weds the theoretical and statistical approaches through a mechanistic, stochastic model for measles epidemics (see also Finkenstädt and Grenfell 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These formulations, which we have previously used to explore the dynamics of measles epidemics in England and Wales in the prevaccination period (12,29,35), incorporate age structure, simple metapopulation structure, and environmental or demographic stochasticity. The models are extended versions of the standard susceptible/exposed/ infective/recovered (SEIR) model, which has been exhaustively analyzed in the mathematical epidemiology literature (10,11,13,(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42). We use a more realistic age-structured (RAS) measles model (12,16,35), which takes the basic epidemiological structure of the SEIR model and adds age structure and a more detailed seasonal pattern to it.…”
Section: Data Sets and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measles epidemics in human populations have been a subject of investigations for a long time ( , [London & Yorke, 1973a], [Dietz, 1976]), since rather good empirical time series are available, and various aspects of recent paradigmatic theories like deterministic chaos in prevaccination dynamics ( [Schwartz & Smith, 1983], [Schenzle, 1984], [Aron & Schwartz, 1984], [Schaffer, 1985], [Schaffer & Kott, 1985], [Olsen & Schaffer, 1990], [May & Sugihara, 1990], [Rand & Wilson, 1991], [Grenfell, 1992], [Bolker & Grenfell, 1993], [Drepper et al, 1994]) and criticality in island populations have been investigated ( [Rhodes & Anderson, 1996], [Rhodes et al, 1997]). …”
Section: Measles Around Criticalitymentioning
confidence: 99%