2015
DOI: 10.2172/1371516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Time Domain Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) Deep Soil Site Methodology Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is currently performing research and development to develop a nonlinear soil-structure interaction (NLSSI) methodology for application to nuclear facilities (Spears and Coleman 2014). This methodology is a series of steps that an analyst or reviewer can follow to perform a fully nonlinear SSI analysis in the time domain including 1) nonlinear site response, 2) nonlinear hysteretic soil behavior at the foundation vicinity, 3) geometric nonlinearities at the foundation including gapping and sliding and 4) nonlinear behavior of the structure such as concrete cracking.…”
Section: A Methodology For Time-domain Ssi Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is currently performing research and development to develop a nonlinear soil-structure interaction (NLSSI) methodology for application to nuclear facilities (Spears and Coleman 2014). This methodology is a series of steps that an analyst or reviewer can follow to perform a fully nonlinear SSI analysis in the time domain including 1) nonlinear site response, 2) nonlinear hysteretic soil behavior at the foundation vicinity, 3) geometric nonlinearities at the foundation including gapping and sliding and 4) nonlinear behavior of the structure such as concrete cracking.…”
Section: A Methodology For Time-domain Ssi Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, Anderson, Elkhoraibi et al (2013) compared the results from SAP2000 (Computers and Structures Inc. 2011) to those from SASSI2010 (Ostadan and Deng 2011), while Coronado, Anderson et al (2013) compared the results from the extended subtraction method in SASSI2010 to those calculated using the commercial finite-element code ANSYS (ANSYS Inc. 2013). Spears and Coleman (2014), in a comprehensive study, developed a methodology for nonlinear SSI analysis in the time domain, compared the SSI responses calculated using SASSI and timedomain codes, and identified some issues regarding the usage of these codes. A similar study was performed by and , which involved benchmarking time-domain SSI analysis in LS-DYNA against SASSI2000, performing detailed comparisons between the SASSI2000 and LS-DYNA results for highly nonlinear cases and identifying potential practical issues in performing SSI analysis using these programs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil-structure interaction in a time domain code is performed using the direct method Spears and Coleman, 2014). In the direct method, the whole soilstructure system is analyzed in a single step thereby circumventing the use of superposition, which is extensively used in traditional SSI analysis methods (including SASSI and CLASSI) and is restricted to linear analyses.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These documents, like the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) methodology (Spears and Coleman, 2014) and the forthcoming Appendix B of the new version of the ASCE 4 Standard (American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2015) take a significant step further by introducing new concepts, approaches and tools. However, the nature of these provisions is still nonmandatory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%