2005
DOI: 10.1193/1.1856535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Site Amplification as Function of 30 m Shear Wave Velocity

Abstract: We develop empirical relationships to predict nonlinear (i.e., amplitudedependant) amplification factors for 5% damped response spectral acceleration as a continuous function of average shear wave velocity in the upper 30 m, V s-30 . We evaluate amplification factors as residuals between spectral accelerations from recordings and modified rock attenuation relationships for active regions. Amplification at low-and mid-periods is shown to increase with decreasing V s-30 and to exhibit nonlinearity that is depend… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
166
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(69 reference statements)
8
166
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The principal difference between b value trends in the two prior models is the significant dip between 0.1s and 1.0s in the simulation-based results (Walling et al 2008). Interestingly, the centrifuge data are more consistent with the relatively flat trend of the model derived from data (Choi and Stewart 2005). …”
Section: Spectral Amplification Of Ground Motionssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The principal difference between b value trends in the two prior models is the significant dip between 0.1s and 1.0s in the simulation-based results (Walling et al 2008). Interestingly, the centrifuge data are more consistent with the relatively flat trend of the model derived from data (Choi and Stewart 2005). …”
Section: Spectral Amplification Of Ground Motionssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In this section, this variability is investigated by computing the spectral amplification at different periods for the alternative site-response methodologies at the three sites in the LA basin, and comparing results to the values suggested by parts 1 and 2 of BSSC (2001) and to recently published amplification factors for tectonically active regions (Choi and Stewart, 2005) for the corresponding site conditions (classes C, D, and E). Figure 19a-c depicts the variation of site amplification relative to the reference site (NEHRP BC boundary) PGA, evaluated by means of the linear elastic, equivalent-linear, and average nonlinear models for the Obregon Park (class C), La Cienega (class D), and Meloland (class E) sites, respectively.…”
Section: Site-amplification Factors In Seismic Design Codes and Attenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amplification factors of Choi and Stewart (2005), which were derived based on 1828 recordings from 154 earthquakes, using recordings from worldwide shallow crustal earthquakes near active plate margins and excluding subduction and interplate events. In contrast to published studies by Boore and Atkinson (2006), Chiou and Youngs (2006) (http://peer.berkeley.edu/prod-ucts/ nga_project.html), and Campbell and Bozorgnia (2007), Choi and Stewart (2005) derived their factors as continuous functions of both PGA RO and V s30 , and they converted the reference site conditions to a consistent BC-boundary reference profile, which eliminates inconsistencies in the description of the reference soil profile as a source of divergence in the compared siteamplification factors illustrated in Figure 20. 3.…”
Section: Site-amplification Factors In Seismic Design Codes and Attenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambraseys and Douglas [9] employed a linear function to indicate the site e ect. This type of classi cation leads to inaccurate results, especially for soft-clay-soil sites or saturated sandy sites, because nonlinearity is not considered in the site response, Choi and Stewart [18]. In other attenuation relations, the site condition is modeled by using a function with two linear and nonlinear components.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studies 81 Comparison With Nga Eqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function recommended by Boore and Atkinson [17], which is slight modi cation of the site amplication given by Choi and Stewart [18], is adopted in this paper. These equations are applicable to 180 V s30 1300 m/s and should not be applied for very hard rock sites, i.e.…”
Section: Site Response Term (F Site )mentioning
confidence: 99%