2010 7th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks &Amp; Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP 2010) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/csndsp16145.2010.5580373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear single channel source separation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective of NMF is to locate an estimated factorization for a nonnegative matrix V into two nonnegative networks W and H. The columns of W are called basis functions, while the rows of H represent the hidden nonnegative sources that correspond to each basis function. In comparison, NMF is better than other matrix factorization approaches such as principal component analysis (PCA) or independent component analysis (ICA) [3] because nonnegativity constraint in NMF produces sparse results which are advantageous [4], [5]. NMF claims that it can be easily solved by multiplicative update (MU) rules [6]- [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of NMF is to locate an estimated factorization for a nonnegative matrix V into two nonnegative networks W and H. The columns of W are called basis functions, while the rows of H represent the hidden nonnegative sources that correspond to each basis function. In comparison, NMF is better than other matrix factorization approaches such as principal component analysis (PCA) or independent component analysis (ICA) [3] because nonnegativity constraint in NMF produces sparse results which are advantageous [4], [5]. NMF claims that it can be easily solved by multiplicative update (MU) rules [6]- [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If I≥J; then it is the Over-determined case [26]. (iii) Mixture: It is related to the type of mixtures; whether it is linear [17][18][19][20][21] or non-linear [27], and the mixing operation; whether it is convolutive [17,[19][20][21] or instantaneous [28]. The convolutive case is more realistic than the instantaneous one because it considers the reverberation of the channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These assumptions include prior information about the mixture and the problem dimensionality. A great deal of research assumed a linear [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] or nonlinear mixture, 18 instantaneous 19,20 or convolutive 11,12,[14][15][16][17] mixing process, and the sources are less (underdetermined), [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]21 equal (determined, 22 or greater (overdetermined) 21,23 than the number of microphones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%