2016
DOI: 10.12989/eas.2016.11.5.905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear seismic analysis of a super 13-element reinforced concrete beam-column joint model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The compressive arch action and catenary action were clearly observed in the experiments. Due to exorbitant cost and safety issues, numerical simulations are preferred for studying the progressive collapse resistance of structures [18][19][20][21][22][23], in which nonlinear static and dynamic analyses had been conducted [24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compressive arch action and catenary action were clearly observed in the experiments. Due to exorbitant cost and safety issues, numerical simulations are preferred for studying the progressive collapse resistance of structures [18][19][20][21][22][23], in which nonlinear static and dynamic analyses had been conducted [24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given their highly uncertain nature, many experts (seismologists, engineers and researchers) have adopted and advocated the use of the probabilistic approach in quantifying the seismic hazard to be expected for a particular region. Once the hazard is quantified, the vulnerability of buildings [1][2][3], particular older-type reinforced concrete structures can be confidently assessed. Currently, the development of hazard maps has been crucial, and plays a fundamental role in hazard mitigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%