Nonlinear seismic analysis of a high-pier, long-span, continuous RC frame bridge under spatially variable ground motions

Abstract

Many very large bridges with high piers and long spans are under rapid construction in mountainous regions especially in Western China. However, the current seismic design methods in China are based on a code which only applies to bridges with span up to 150 m. To evaluate the risk of the inapplicable design method and the influence of spatially variable ground motions (SVGM) on the seismic response of very large bridges, a high-pier, long-span, continuous RC frame bridge is numerically studied. This study considers whether multiple support excitation can be simplified into specific uniform excitation cases while guaranteeing the conservative seismic demands for this bridge.Non-stationary SVGM on both bedrock and the surface of multiple soil layers are simulated including wave passage effects, coherency effects and site amplification effects. The nonlinear dynamic finite element model of the bridge is analysed for two groups of earthquake motions, namely group 1 -bedrock and group 2 -ground surface excitations. Each group contains three different excitations, i.e. i) multiple support excitation ii) the largest and iii) the smallest accelerations from the SVGM. The relative displacements, internal force responses and ultimate damage modes are obtained and compared. For this bridge the uniform ground motion input with the largest accelerations provides conservative seismic demands for most structural components when the site amplification effect is not considered (group 1).However, for the ground surface motions, where site amplification needs to be taken into account (group 2), in several cases the uniform ground motion with the largest accelerations results in lower response than that predicted when considering SVGM. The present results indicate that only when the bridges are located on ideal simple topography where site effects have little influence, the uniform excitation with the largest accelerations taken from the SVGM may be an alternative input for seismic analysis.However, for bridges on complex terrain, where site effects can significantly amplify the ground motions at the bedrock, SVGM need to be applied as input for the seismic analysis. As spatial variability of input motion is not a mandatory requirement in the Chinese bridges design code, these results suggest that the existing design code for very large bridges should be modified accordingly.

Dynamic Responses of Vehicle‐CRTS III Slab Track System and Vehicle Running Safety Subjected to Uniform Seismic Excitation

“…Mylona et al [5] investigated the dynamic response of piers on pile foundations under combined translational and rotational seismic excitation. Li et al [6] used SVGM as input of seismic analysis and analyzed its dynamic response of long-span frame bridges. Deshan et al [7] studied the vulnerability of bridges to major and after-shock excitations.…”

Digital twin-based life-cycle seismic performance assessment of a long-span cable-stayed bridge

“…Compared to beam-column elements in many other studies, shell elements could provide more intuitive modeling of the rectangular hollow section towers of the physical bridge, especially the beam-column conjunction areas. Furthermore, the use of shell elements for simulating seismic behaviors of pylons and piers of bridges has also been widely validated in many other studies (Son & Lee 2011;Li et al 2018;Lin et al 2021b;Qiu et al 2022). The shell elements contained both concrete and steel layers to simulate the composite material behavior of reinforced concrete components (Lu et al 2013), whose thickness was determined based on the sectional reinforcement details as shown in Fig.…”

Seismic analysis of high-speed railway irregular bridge–track system considering V-shaped canyon effect

“…The effects of many aspects of spatially varying ground motions, including the wave passage, coherency loss, local site effect, etc., on the seismic responses and fragilities of highway bridges, have been extensively investigated [10,24]. However, for railway bridges, the higher the rigidity of the piers, the lower the reinforcement ratio [4,25].…”