2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.83.011907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear rheology of active particle suspensions: Insights from an analytical approach

Abstract: We consider active suspensions in the isotropic phase subjected to a shear flow. Using a set of extended hydrodynamic equations we derive a variety of analytical expressions for rheological quantities such as shear viscosity and normal stress differences. In agreement to full-blown numerical calculations and experiments we find a shear-thickening or -thinning behavior depending on whether the particles are contractile or extensile. Moreover, our analytical approach predicts that the normal stress differences c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by the slow-swimming perturbation expansion which shows that the spatial autocorrelation function of the concentration fluctuations is delta-correlated in real space to the first three orders. Recall that it is typically nonlinear effects or near-field effects that are responsible for the substantial concentration fluctuations seen in other studies [25,29,[55][56][57], while near-field effects are neglected here. We consider next the shear component of the active stress, which under the deterministic mean field theory is the driver of the instability of the uniform isotropic state.…”
Section: Microswimmer Fluctuations and Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is supported by the slow-swimming perturbation expansion which shows that the spatial autocorrelation function of the concentration fluctuations is delta-correlated in real space to the first three orders. Recall that it is typically nonlinear effects or near-field effects that are responsible for the substantial concentration fluctuations seen in other studies [25,29,[55][56][57], while near-field effects are neglected here. We consider next the shear component of the active stress, which under the deterministic mean field theory is the driver of the instability of the uniform isotropic state.…”
Section: Microswimmer Fluctuations and Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further investigations include the effect of fluid viscoelasticity [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] , swimming near a fluid interface [32][33][34] or inside a channel [35][36][37][38][39] , and the hydrodynamic interactions between two neighboring microswimmers near a wall 40 . Intriguing collective behavior and spatiotemporal patterns may arise from the interaction of many swimmers, including the onset of propagating density waves [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] and laning [49][50][51][52] , the motility-induced phase separation [53][54][55][56][57] and the emergence of active turbulence [58][59][60][61][62][63][64] . Boundaries have also been shown to induce order in collective flows of bacterial suspensions [65][66][67] , leading to potential applications in autonomous microfluidic systems 68 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was first noted in a theoretical study by Hatwalne et al, 17 who argued that extensile particles or so-called pushers for which r 0 < 0 should have a negative intrinsic viscosity ½g < 0, whereas contractile particles or pullers for which r 0 > 0 should have ½g > 0. A number of more sophisticated models have been proposed since, [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] which usually extend theories for the rheology of passive rod suspensions [27][28][29] to account for this active dipole and have led to similar predictions. Of particular relevance to the present study is the model of Saintillan, 20 which calculated the effective viscosity and normal stress differences in a dilute active suspension in uniform shear flow as functions of shear rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%