46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 2005
DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-2260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Reduced Order Random Response Analysis of Structures with Shallow Curvature

Abstract: The goal of this investigation is to further develop nonlinear modal numerical simulation methods for application to geometrically nonlinear response of structures with shallow curvature under random loadings. For reduced order analysis, the modal basis selection must be capable of reflecting the coupling in both the linear and nonlinear stiffness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, the structural behavior to these different sources has been considered separately. In the first class of problems, the quasi-static panel response (Kontinos, 1997;Culler et al, 2009), and dynamic instabilities (McNamara et al, 2005;Mei et al, 1999;Culler et al, 2009) has been studied by modeling the boundary layer loads and other external acoustic excitations: (1) as a random in time, and uniform in space acoustic load (Przekop and Rizzi, 2006;Spottswood et al, 2010), (2) using semi-empirical models (Maestrello, 1969;Hwang et al, 2009;Hambric et al, 2004;Coe and Chyu, 1972;Wu and Maestrello, 1995), and (3) using high-fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations (Frendi, 1997(Frendi, , 2004. There are limitations of each of these approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, the structural behavior to these different sources has been considered separately. In the first class of problems, the quasi-static panel response (Kontinos, 1997;Culler et al, 2009), and dynamic instabilities (McNamara et al, 2005;Mei et al, 1999;Culler et al, 2009) has been studied by modeling the boundary layer loads and other external acoustic excitations: (1) as a random in time, and uniform in space acoustic load (Przekop and Rizzi, 2006;Spottswood et al, 2010), (2) using semi-empirical models (Maestrello, 1969;Hwang et al, 2009;Hambric et al, 2004;Coe and Chyu, 1972;Wu and Maestrello, 1995), and (3) using high-fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations (Frendi, 1997(Frendi, , 2004. There are limitations of each of these approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consideration of non-planar configurations is the subject of Ref. [21]. For such structures, where an inherent transverse and in-plane coupling exists, the set of eigenvectors containing both transverse and in-plane components appear to be a set of primary choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where i is the mode number. γ ni , indicating the modal contribution, can be mathematically defined, from Equation (4), as follows [51][52][53][54]:…”
Section: Modal Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%