2002
DOI: 10.1007/s101070100244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear programming without a penalty function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
572
0
11

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 707 publications
(583 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
572
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we depict the general framework of a new SQP algorithm that combines ideas from both merit functions and the filter introduced by Fletcher and Leyffer in [8]. The use of several penalty parameters defined automatically by the previous iterates avoids the premature reduction of θ as well as the zigzagging that can occur when a non-monotone strategy is used to update this parameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we depict the general framework of a new SQP algorithm that combines ideas from both merit functions and the filter introduced by Fletcher and Leyffer in [8]. The use of several penalty parameters defined automatically by the previous iterates avoids the premature reduction of θ as well as the zigzagging that can occur when a non-monotone strategy is used to update this parameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome some of the difficulties inherent to merit functions, Fletcher and Leyffer [8] introduced the idea of using a filter. Instead of combining infeasibility and optimality in one single function, the filter method borrows the idea of nondominance from multi-criteria optimization theory.…”
Section: The Filter Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filter methods were first introduced by Fletcher and Leyffer [12] as a way to globalize sequential linear programming (SLP) and sequential quadratic programming (SQP) without using a penalty function. The Audet-Dennis GPS filter approach avoids the pitfalls of penalty parameters, but its convergence to standard first-order stationary points is not guaranteed [5] due to GPS limitations.…”
Section: Mesh Adaptive Direct Search (Mads)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, to be consistent with [11,12], only infeasible points are included in the filter, and feasible points are tracked separately. Using these two restrictions, we include the following terminology [3]: Definition 3.3 A point x is said to be filtered by a filter F if any of the following properties hold:…”
Section: Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high level algorithm is suggested by Gonzaga et al [7] but not yet implemented -the internal algorithms are not proposed. The filter, a new concept introduced by Fletcher and Leyffer [3], replaces the merit function avoiding the penalty parameter estimation and the difficulties related to the nondifferentiability. In the IR approach two independent phases are performed in each iteration -the feasibility and the optimality phases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%