“…The choice of a phase description for the cellular oscillator is motivated by its generality and by prior success in analyzing coupling in the segmentation clock ( Riedel-Kruse et al, 2007 ; Uriu et al, 2017 ; Herrgen et al, 2010 ). Core genetic components of the cellular oscillator have been identified and their dynamics can be described by detailed delay models ( Schröter et al, 2012 ; Lewis, 2003 ; Monk, 2003 ; Horikawa et al, 2006 ; Ay et al, 2013 ; Hirata et al, 2004 ; Jensen et al, 2003 ), but since we do not measure any of the components in these networks, the choice of phase oscillators captures the core oscillatory behavior without additional underconstrained parameters ( Kotani et al, 2012 ; Kotani et al, 2020 ). Thus, although we do not anticipate any qualitative differences between these modeling approaches, future work could include such a detailed description of oscillatory genes, potentially allowing a more direct connection to mutant conditions or imaging experiments.…”