Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2000
DOI: 10.1021/ja003129h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Optical Properties of Molecularly Bridged Gold Nanoparticle Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
127
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using b w = 0.56 10 À30 esu, as reported in the literature, we have found out b nano = 3.8 10 À24 esu for 80 nm gold nanorod and 4.2 10 À24 esu for DNA adsorbed gold nanorod, which is about 3-4 orders of magnitude higher than the b values reported for the best available molecular chromophores [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]37] and 1-2 orders of magnitude higher than the b value reported for gold nanoparticles. [6,22,38,39] This higher b value for nanorods with respect to nanosphere can be due to several facts and these are 1) The presence of {110} facets, which is not present in nanospheres, is known to give rise to strong absorption energies; 2) the surface electromagnetic field of rods is the highest relative to other shapes due to the rods high curvatures (called "the lightning rod" effect [40] ); 3) the presence of multipoles; and 4) possibility of single-photon resonance enhancement. The optical responses of particles that are small compared to the wavelength can be described usually in the framework of electric-dipole approximation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using b w = 0.56 10 À30 esu, as reported in the literature, we have found out b nano = 3.8 10 À24 esu for 80 nm gold nanorod and 4.2 10 À24 esu for DNA adsorbed gold nanorod, which is about 3-4 orders of magnitude higher than the b values reported for the best available molecular chromophores [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]37] and 1-2 orders of magnitude higher than the b value reported for gold nanoparticles. [6,22,38,39] This higher b value for nanorods with respect to nanosphere can be due to several facts and these are 1) The presence of {110} facets, which is not present in nanospheres, is known to give rise to strong absorption energies; 2) the surface electromagnetic field of rods is the highest relative to other shapes due to the rods high curvatures (called "the lightning rod" effect [40] ); 3) the presence of multipoles; and 4) possibility of single-photon resonance enhancement. The optical responses of particles that are small compared to the wavelength can be described usually in the framework of electric-dipole approximation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are the most stable MNP; they can be synthesized with different sizes and shapes; and they are easily functionalized with diverse ligands 3 . AuNPs have numerous applications in nanomedicine 4,5 , biotechnology 6 , microelectronics 7 , optics [8][9][10] , gas sensing [11][12][13] and catalysis [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3,4] Other techniques for the controlled assembly of Au particles include the use of template molecules with defined symmetry [5] and interparticle spacing, [6] metal coordination, [7] a polymer-mediated "BM" strategy coupled with hydrogen bonding, [8] and Langmuir techniques. [9] Although some success has been achieved, [8,10] the formation of aggregates of controllable size and shape in solution remains far from routine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%