2016
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2016.2526671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Observer for 3D Rigid Body Motion Estimation Using Doppler Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, some literature considered special measurement situations. In Reference 15, a pose and velocity observer, whose innovation term was designed with the exponential coordinates, was constructed on SE(3) and an observer was designed in Reference 16 to estimate the translational and rotational motion of a rigid body using Doppler measurements. In Reference 17, a practical case that determining the relative motion of a space object which utilizes line‐of‐sight range and range rate measurements by body‐fixed sensors, was considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, some literature considered special measurement situations. In Reference 15, a pose and velocity observer, whose innovation term was designed with the exponential coordinates, was constructed on SE(3) and an observer was designed in Reference 16 to estimate the translational and rotational motion of a rigid body using Doppler measurements. In Reference 17, a practical case that determining the relative motion of a space object which utilizes line‐of‐sight range and range rate measurements by body‐fixed sensors, was considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually they are treated as individual problems and are achieved based on location-related and velocity-related measurements, respectively. Specifically, the location-related measurements mainly include timeof-arrival (TOA), time-difference-of-arrival (TDOA), angle-of-arrival (AOA) and received signal strength (RSS) [3][4][5], while the velocity-related measurements can be obtained from Doppler shifts [6,7] or synthetic aperture radars (SARs) [8,9]. Significant progress has been made and quite a lot algorithms have been proposed in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, regarding to target localization, least squares [10], Bayeisan inference [11], convex optimization [12] and iterative algorithms [13] have been proposed and a survey on localization techniques can be found in [14]. On the other hand, various velocity estimation algorithms based on Doppler shifts and/or SARs measurements have been reported in [6,7] and [8,9], respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pertinent to observers which include motion dynamics, [9] developed a globally convergent angular velocity observer using only orientation measurements, and used the natural energy function on the momentum as a Lyapunov candidate which resulted in a quadratic stable internal observer. [10] and [11] developed a nonlinear observer which estimated pose and a velocity and further demonstrated stability. Both these observers, however, used pose and velocity measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to [9], we propose an alternative approach to compute a vector difference using a push-forward vector operation. Furthermore, since the subject of this paper is concerned with a non-cooperative Target and velocity measurement is unavailable, the wellformalized theory of autonomous error dynamics in [3], [6] and [7] cannot be used directly and additionally, the observers in [10] and [11] are not applicable. Therefore, in this paper, we address the problem of estimating the inertial pose and body velocity of a non-cooperative free-floating Target using only the relative noisy pose measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%