2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0195-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear multivariate models of successional change in community structure using the von Bertalanffy curve

Abstract: von Bertalanffy curves were used to describe the nonlinear relationship between assemblages inhabiting holdfasts of the kelp Ecklonia radiata and the volume of the holdfast. This was done using nonlinear canonical analyses of principal coordinates (NCAP). The volume of the holdfast is a proxy for the age of the plant and, thus, the canonical axis is a proxy for succession in the marine invertebrate community inhabiting the holdfast. Analyses were done at several different taxonomic resolutions on the basis of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NMDS summarizes relationships between all pairs of species data and represents it in multiple dimensions as distances, so the closer two points are, the more similar they are (e.g., same species composition; Kenkel and Orló ci 1986). The four sampling methods greatly varied in sampling effort; therefore, the HornÐMorisita distance measure was used, which is independent of the size of the sampling unit (Anderson et al 2005). Natural enemy totals for all sampling methods were analyzed with NMDS (metaMDS from the vegan package) for each month and year by using the statistical software R (R Development Core Team 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMDS summarizes relationships between all pairs of species data and represents it in multiple dimensions as distances, so the closer two points are, the more similar they are (e.g., same species composition; Kenkel and Orló ci 1986). The four sampling methods greatly varied in sampling effort; therefore, the HornÐMorisita distance measure was used, which is independent of the size of the sampling unit (Anderson et al 2005). Natural enemy totals for all sampling methods were analyzed with NMDS (metaMDS from the vegan package) for each month and year by using the statistical software R (R Development Core Team 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, given sufficient quantitative information, it may also be possible to statistically correct for the effects of large predators on observed fish assemblages using BRUV (e.g. Anderson et al 2005 Given that sharks can influence the observed structure of fish assemblages measured using BRUV, our results raise concerns over BRUV monitoring programs, particularly in situations where sharks are likely to systematically vary among treatments. For example, the effect sizes associated with observed differences between fish assemblages inside and outside 'no-take' marine reserves measured using BRUV may be biased by the occurrence of large predatory fishes.…”
Section: Implications For Bruv Samplingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2004). Explicit models of changes in community structure with holdfast volume, including species accumulation curves, are given elsewhere (Anderson et al. 2005a,b).…”
Section: Ecological Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%