2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.105842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear modeling and control strategies for bone diseases based on TGFβ and Wnt factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Temporal biochemical models are organized based on which of two prevailing mathematical formulations are used to describe bone cell population dynamics and their biochemical signaling dynamics in the BMU. The temporal models that adopt the power law approach defined in Section 4.1 (Komarova et al, 2003;Komarova, 2005;Garzón-Alvarado, 2012;Liò et al, 2012;Graham et al, 2013;Jerez and Chen, 2015;Chen-Charpentier and Diakite, 2016;Coelho et al, 2016;Jerez et al, 2018;Camacho and Jerez, 2019;Idrees et al, 2019;Javed et al, 2019;Idrees and Sohail, 2020;Miranda et al, 2020;Camacho and Jerez, 2021;Islam et al, 2021;Cook et al, 2022) are categorized in Table 2, described in Section 5.2, and detailed in Supplementary Table S1. The temporal models that adopt the mass action kinetics approach defined in Section 4.2 (Lemaire et al, 2004;Marathe et al, 2008;Pivonka et al, 2008;Peterson and Riggs, 2010;Marathe et al, 2011;Schmidt et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2011;Buenzli et al, 2012b;Peterson and Riggs, 2012;Ross et al, 2012;Wang and Qin, 2012;Pivonka et al, 2013;Post et al, 2013;Scheiner et al, 2013;Ji et al, 2014;Scheiner et al, 2014;Berkhout et al, 2015;Eudy et a...…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Temporal biochemical models are organized based on which of two prevailing mathematical formulations are used to describe bone cell population dynamics and their biochemical signaling dynamics in the BMU. The temporal models that adopt the power law approach defined in Section 4.1 (Komarova et al, 2003;Komarova, 2005;Garzón-Alvarado, 2012;Liò et al, 2012;Graham et al, 2013;Jerez and Chen, 2015;Chen-Charpentier and Diakite, 2016;Coelho et al, 2016;Jerez et al, 2018;Camacho and Jerez, 2019;Idrees et al, 2019;Javed et al, 2019;Idrees and Sohail, 2020;Miranda et al, 2020;Camacho and Jerez, 2021;Islam et al, 2021;Cook et al, 2022) are categorized in Table 2, described in Section 5.2, and detailed in Supplementary Table S1. The temporal models that adopt the mass action kinetics approach defined in Section 4.2 (Lemaire et al, 2004;Marathe et al, 2008;Pivonka et al, 2008;Peterson and Riggs, 2010;Marathe et al, 2011;Schmidt et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2011;Buenzli et al, 2012b;Peterson and Riggs, 2012;Ross et al, 2012;Wang and Qin, 2012;Pivonka et al, 2013;Post et al, 2013;Scheiner et al, 2013;Ji et al, 2014;Scheiner et al, 2014;Berkhout et al, 2015;Eudy et a...…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model adds explicit state variables for RANKL and OPG by setting one of the original paracrine power parameters equal to zero, namely the one corresponding to osteoblast-derived osteoclast regulation, and formulating separate equations for RANKL and OPG levels. Camacho and Jerez (2021) follows Ryser et al (2009) by dropping paracrine signal exponents to explicitly model TGF-β and Wnt as state variables in a temporal model. Camacho and Jerez (2021) also updates the cell population equations to incorporate TGF-β-induced osteoclast apoptosis and Wntinduced osteoblast proliferation.…”
Section: Power Law Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the models that focus on explicitly capturing certain autocrine and paracrine signals is the spatial extension byRyser et al (2009). This model adds explicit state variables for RANKL and OPG by setting one of the original paracrine power parameters equal to zero, namely the one corresponding to osteoblast-derived osteoclast regulation, and formulating separate equations for RANKL and OPG levels Camacho and Jerez (2021). followsRyser et al (2009) by dropping paracrine signal exponents to explicitly model TGF-β and Wnt as state variables in a temporal model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%