1994
DOI: 10.1080/00207179408921513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear model validation using correlation tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, during intense magnetospheric activity, the model overestimated the magnitude of the sub-storm. This shows that the neural network structure is relevant to the system and that we do not need to increase the order of the model (Billings and Voon, 1986;Billings and Zhu, 1989).…”
Section: Al Prediction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, during intense magnetospheric activity, the model overestimated the magnitude of the sub-storm. This shows that the neural network structure is relevant to the system and that we do not need to increase the order of the model (Billings and Voon, 1986;Billings and Zhu, 1989).…”
Section: Al Prediction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of the noise terms can eliminate bias in estimating the coefficients. The final stage is model validation, using methods such as the correlation tests (Billings and Voon, 1986;Billings and Zhu, 1989) or model performance analysis. The full description of the NARMAX algorithm is very complex and, as such, it is beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Narmax Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, the identified model was subjected to both correlation tests (Billings and Zhu, 1989) and the model predictive performance was analyzed in both time and frequency.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%