2012
DOI: 10.1002/oca.2049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear model predictive control strategy for low thrust spacecraft missions

Abstract: SUMMARYIn this paper, two nonlinear model predictive control (MPC) strategies are applied to solve a low thrust interplanetary rendezvous problem. Each employs a unique, nonclassical parameterization of the control to adapt the nonlinear MPC approach to interplanetary orbital dynamics with low control authority. The approach is demonstrated numerically for a minimum‐fuel Earth‐to‐Mars rendezvous maneuver, cast as a simplified coplanar circular orbit heliocentric transfer problem. The interplanetary transfer is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, employ a 1‐norm cost function on inputs to reflect the direct correlation between impulsive accelerations and fuel consumption. Moreover, a variable prediction horizon (VH) helps facilitate finite time manoeuvre completion . VH‐LTV‐MPC imposes a particularly high computational burden, because the prediction model must be updated at each time step, and the VH optimisation is not convex.…”
Section: Background and Design Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, employ a 1‐norm cost function on inputs to reflect the direct correlation between impulsive accelerations and fuel consumption. Moreover, a variable prediction horizon (VH) helps facilitate finite time manoeuvre completion . VH‐LTV‐MPC imposes a particularly high computational burden, because the prediction model must be updated at each time step, and the VH optimisation is not convex.…”
Section: Background and Design Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weiss while optimizing a user defined cost function based on a predictive model for the system dynamics. The ability to explicitly handle multivariable systems, constraints, and performance objectives has rendered MPC very attractive in various fields such as automotive, factory automation, and spacecraft control [3], [4], where it has been proposed for orbital rendezvous [5]- [7], attitude control [8], formation flight [9], and interplanetary transfer [10]. Even though MPC requires higher computational load than conventional closedloop controllers (e.g., PID), linear-quadratic MPC results in quadratic programs that can be solved quickly and efficiently in resource constrained hardware by compact and easyto-verify algorithms, see, e.g., [11] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum-time MPC approach has been used in Starek and Kolmanovsky (2012), Petersen et al (2013) for low thrust orbital maneuvering and for hypersonic glider guidance, respectively. In these applications, minimumtime MPC has been exploited to improve robustness to unmeasured disturbances and uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%