2011
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/13/8/083010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear magnetic field dependence of spin polarization in high-density two-dimensional electron systems

Abstract: The spin polarization (P) of high-density InSb two-dimensional electron systems (2DESs) has been measured using both parallel and tilted magnetic fields. P is found to exhibit a superlinear increase with the total field B. This P-B nonlinearity results in a difference in spin susceptibility between its real value χ s and χ gm ∝ m * g * (m * and g * are the effective mass and g factor, respectively) as routinely used in experiments. We demonstrate that such a P-B nonlinearity originates from the linearly P-depe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Noteworthy is that the found difference in spin-polarization properties of InSb and HgTe QW is not due to a small effective mass in InSb, as was suggested in Ref. 8, since the corresponding mass here m * /m 0 = 0.024 12 is not radically different from that for the InSb QW m * /m 0 = 0.018÷0.026. 7 This is a topic for future investigations to understand whether this difference is due to the Γ 6 and Γ 8 characters of conduction bands in these materials or due to a relatively wide QW of 30 nm in InSb 8 when the magnetic length equals the well width already at 0.75 T. Second, another system of straight traces along the coincidences, descending from a single point B 0…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Noteworthy is that the found difference in spin-polarization properties of InSb and HgTe QW is not due to a small effective mass in InSb, as was suggested in Ref. 8, since the corresponding mass here m * /m 0 = 0.024 12 is not radically different from that for the InSb QW m * /m 0 = 0.018÷0.026. 7 This is a topic for future investigations to understand whether this difference is due to the Γ 6 and Γ 8 characters of conduction bands in these materials or due to a relatively wide QW of 30 nm in InSb 8 when the magnetic length equals the well width already at 0.75 T. Second, another system of straight traces along the coincidences, descending from a single point B 0…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Here B 1 = hn S /e is the ρ xx (B ⊥ ) minimum position for ν = 1. Notable is that similar equation for a B(B ⊥ ) graph, usually built in other works (e.g., in Ref. 8), holds exactly for the whole range of θ. The descending straight beams in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a possible origin of this effect, we consider exchange interaction between electrons, which is known to lead to a nonlinearity of the Zeeman splitting on the external magnetic field at moderate fields. 11,14 In this case, the effective g * factor besides g 0 , the Landé factor like at B = 0, contains a contribution linear in the spin polarization…”
Section: A Linear Mpgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 This novel material is the subject of numerous experimental studies of transport, optical, magneto-optical, and spin-related phenomena. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The characteristics driving the interest in this novel narrow gap material are the high carrier mobility, small effective masses, large Landé g * factor, possibility of the mesoscopic spindependent ballistic transport, and a strong spin-orbit coupling. The latter gives rise to a number of optoelectronic effects such as, e.g., terahertz photoconductivity 15 and the circular photogalvanic effect [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] recently observed in InSb QWs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%